| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3283 | 回復(fù): 17 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿(mǎn)足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
taojiawei新蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
Angew一審的回復(fù) 已有11人參與
|
||
|
請(qǐng)大家?guī)托〉芸匆幌逻@個(gè)審稿意見(jiàn),有戲嗎? Our impression is that the above-mentioned manuscript might indeed become suitable for publication in Angewandte Chemie. However, the criticism from the referees requires that we defer our final decision until you have considered the remarks and revised your manuscript accordingly. 1. Please rate the importance of the reported results Reviewer #1: Highly important (top 20%) Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%) Reviewer #3: Highly important (top 20%) -------------------- 2. Please rate the citation of previous publications Reviewer #1: Appropriate Reviewer #2: Appropriate Reviewer #3: Insufficient -------------------- 3. Please rate the length of the manuscript Reviewer #1: Concise Reviewer #2: Concise Reviewer #3: Concise -------------------- 4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data Reviewer #1: Fully consistent Reviewer #2: Fully consistent Reviewer #3: Major inconsistencies -------------------- 5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: (No Response) Reviewer #3: (No Response) |
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
新蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|