| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3350 | 回復(fù): 14 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
elvissong鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
求助SCI審稿意見,麻煩大家分析一下 已有1人參與
|
||
|
投的是medical science monitor,是一篇生信的文章,也是我第一篇sci,目前的狀態(tài)是“Sent to author(s) for corrections (3 weeks) ”。 返回的三個(gè)意見感覺都滿尖銳的 一:分析的mRNA的變化不能反應(yīng)蛋白的變化,畢竟蛋白的變化更重要。為何選擇該mRNA進(jìn)行分析,畢竟一個(gè)mRNA的變化不能反應(yīng)疾病的全貌。。。 這個(gè)我大概還是能解釋的 二: Title and abstract Spaces either missing or are too many throughout the manuscript. Introduction The introduction should include more background. Material and Methods Details of the search should be included in the method section. There should not be only one keyword. The ethics aspects need to be disclosed and appropriate ethics committee approval must be quoted. Besides mRNA populations, microRNAs (miRNAs) may be equally important in AD. Gloabaly, I would suggest authors to add a interaction of mRNA expression with miRNA. Becauxe single-level research does not fully explain the mechanism of disease development. References This is not believable, and the references are too old and not representative. Does this manuscript reference previous literature appropriately? General comments to the Authors The manuscript is poorly written and is full of strange words and expressions and should be proof-read by an English-speaking person. 三: Introduction The introduction is not in a correct format. In this part the authors should discuss more ( around a page) about previous findings and the link between their study and these previous findings. They should on the other hand shorten the length of their explanation about what they re going to do to two or three general lines of explanation. Discussion Discussion is short. The authors should discuss more on the association of mRNA and AD and the downstream pathways that relate these two to each other. How these changes in mRNA levels can justify the histopathological changes in AD should be discussed more. What are the limitations of this study? Conclusions Just a line of conclusion has been presented. Please explain your conclusions clearly. Future directions and clinical implications of these conclusions should be presented too. General comments to the Authors The manuscript need extensive and thorough language proofreading by an expert. 讓我三個(gè)星期內(nèi)改,說實(shí)話還是比較打擊自信的。因?yàn)榈谝淮瓮陡,也不知道這些審稿意見的尖銳程度正常么,意思就是我的文章英文水平很low(雅思7分),然后很多地方都有問題。。三周之內(nèi)改。大家覺得這篇文章還有戲么,是不是應(yīng)該找個(gè)什么機(jī)構(gòu)潤色一下。 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
別人可以不代表你也可以。一行確實(shí)太少,是減分項(xiàng)。人牛,文章創(chuàng)新等有其他加分項(xiàng),倒不影響。不然還是老老實(shí)實(shí)多說幾句吧 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
1 恭喜樓主第一次投稿就擊敗75%的投稿人,進(jìn)入大修 2.poorly written 是部分評(píng)審對(duì)非母語國家投稿的口頭禪 別當(dāng)真 3 一天回答評(píng)審一個(gè)問題 提前提交返修文章 別拖 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |

新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研]
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)280分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 722865 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +13 | Faune 2026-03-21 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +6 | 田洪有 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 291 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 化工2026屆畢業(yè)?/a> 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑310 +3 | 溫柔的晚安 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +4 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +7 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +9 | A-哆啦Z夢(mèng) 2026-03-23 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +7 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +6 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +9 | 苑豆豆 2026-03-20 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +3 | yanzhixue111 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)一志愿985,分?jǐn)?shù)349求調(diào)劑 +6 | zxts12 2026-03-21 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 336化工調(diào)劑 +4 | 王大坦1 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩301分求調(diào)劑 +7 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑0854 +3 | assdll 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|