| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3350 | 回復(fù): 14 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
elvissong鐵蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
求助SCI審稿意見,麻煩大家分析一下 已有1人參與
|
|
|
投的是medical science monitor,是一篇生信的文章,也是我第一篇sci,目前的狀態(tài)是“Sent to author(s) for corrections (3 weeks) ”。 返回的三個(gè)意見感覺都滿尖銳的 一:分析的mRNA的變化不能反應(yīng)蛋白的變化,畢竟蛋白的變化更重要。為何選擇該mRNA進(jìn)行分析,畢竟一個(gè)mRNA的變化不能反應(yīng)疾病的全貌。。。 這個(gè)我大概還是能解釋的 二: Title and abstract Spaces either missing or are too many throughout the manuscript. Introduction The introduction should include more background. Material and Methods Details of the search should be included in the method section. There should not be only one keyword. The ethics aspects need to be disclosed and appropriate ethics committee approval must be quoted. Besides mRNA populations, microRNAs (miRNAs) may be equally important in AD. Gloabaly, I would suggest authors to add a interaction of mRNA expression with miRNA. Becauxe single-level research does not fully explain the mechanism of disease development. References This is not believable, and the references are too old and not representative. Does this manuscript reference previous literature appropriately? General comments to the Authors The manuscript is poorly written and is full of strange words and expressions and should be proof-read by an English-speaking person. 三: Introduction The introduction is not in a correct format. In this part the authors should discuss more ( around a page) about previous findings and the link between their study and these previous findings. They should on the other hand shorten the length of their explanation about what they re going to do to two or three general lines of explanation. Discussion Discussion is short. The authors should discuss more on the association of mRNA and AD and the downstream pathways that relate these two to each other. How these changes in mRNA levels can justify the histopathological changes in AD should be discussed more. What are the limitations of this study? Conclusions Just a line of conclusion has been presented. Please explain your conclusions clearly. Future directions and clinical implications of these conclusions should be presented too. General comments to the Authors The manuscript need extensive and thorough language proofreading by an expert. 讓我三個(gè)星期內(nèi)改,說實(shí)話還是比較打擊自信的。因?yàn)榈谝淮瓮陡,也不知道這些審稿意見的尖銳程度正常么,意思就是我的文章英文水平很low(雅思7分),然后很多地方都有問題。。三周之內(nèi)改。大家覺得這篇文章還有戲么,是不是應(yīng)該找個(gè)什么機(jī)構(gòu)潤(rùn)色一下。 |

金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
1 恭喜樓主第一次投稿就擊敗75%的投稿人,進(jìn)入大修 2.poorly written 是部分評(píng)審對(duì)非母語國家投稿的口頭禪 別當(dāng)真 3 一天回答評(píng)審一個(gè)問題 提前提交返修文章 別拖 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |

新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +7 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +5 | 杰斯塔里斯 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩333求調(diào)劑 +7 | 北道巷 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +3 | 加油a李zs 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jsman 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +7 | 元夕元 2026-03-20 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +14 | 顧九笙要謙虛 2026-03-24 | 20/1000 |
|
|
[考研] 352求調(diào)劑 +4 | 大米飯! 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0854人工智能方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 324 +4 | Promise-jyl 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯?xiàng)l 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +8 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +3 | desto 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +4 | yuyu宇 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 十三加油 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料/農(nóng)業(yè)專業(yè),07/08開頭均可,過線就行 +3 | 呵唔哦豁 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)一志愿985,分?jǐn)?shù)349求調(diào)劑 +6 | zxts12 2026-03-21 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大,0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分,有大創(chuàng)項(xiàng)目,四級(jí)已過 +6 | 幸運(yùn)哩哩 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 初試 317 +7 | 半拉月丙 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué) 學(xué)碩 354求調(diào)劑211或者雙一流 +3 | 我想要讀研究生 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|