| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2011 | 回復(fù): 15 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
盛夏的果實(shí)91金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[求助]
文章中圖的坐標(biāo)標(biāo)錯(cuò),被審稿人發(fā)現(xiàn)了,怎么回復(fù)意見(jiàn)比較好呢? 已有2人參與
|
||
|
因?yàn)樽约旱拇中拇笠,把圖中坐標(biāo)軸的數(shù)值弄錯(cuò)了,應(yīng)該是0.6 0.5 0.4,但是0.5寫(xiě)成0.4了·····被審稿人指出來(lái)了,還說(shuō)有操縱數(shù)據(jù)的嫌疑。目前給的是大修,不知道怎么回答這個(gè)問(wèn)題比較好。懇請(qǐng)各位蟲(chóng)友幫忙。萬(wàn)分感謝。。。 附上審稿人的意見(jiàn): 先是提了意見(jiàn),這個(gè)是第2條:Fig 3a why there were two -0.4 V showing in the X-axis, Please confirm it as it looks like the figure has been manipulated and manipulation is very sensitive in the academic. 一共3條意見(jiàn),然后在所有意見(jiàn)后又寫(xiě)了這句話: overall, the potential of the proposed Mn-CP NPs is well demonstrated but details in experiments were not well presented. Also, Fig 3a showed two identical -0.4 V in the X-axis, which is impossible to happen (it didn't happen in Fig 4a) if the figure is made by a software such as origin or sigmaplot. Please figure out what went wrong. |
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專(zhuān)家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|