| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5846 | 回復(fù): 36 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者linenus將贈(zèng)送您 5 個(gè)金幣 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
計(jì)算機(jī)sci期刊投稿半個(gè)月直接被拒,新年前收到這種拒信好傷心啊 已有2人參與
|
||
投稿Neurocomputing前信心滿滿,沒想到在編輯眼里這么差,半個(gè)月直接拒稿(似乎都不用外審)![]() ,審稿評(píng)論也非常不好,毫不留情地說論文達(dá)不到該期刊的水準(zhǔn),總結(jié)一下審稿意見:1)理論創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)不夠,2)英語表達(dá)問題,3)參考文獻(xiàn)沒有引用到Neurocomputing期刊(這個(gè)問題是不是很大,我一篇都沒有引用到)理論創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)這里沒法修改了,Neurocomputing說我的論文達(dá)不到這種級(jí)別的期刊,那我之前查到符合我論文方向(不平衡分類)的以下期刊都不適合了?感覺自己心有點(diǎn)大,不過這個(gè)期刊列表是我從一篇不平衡分類綜述性論文里面選擇的,它統(tǒng)計(jì)了近幾年不平衡分類論文在以下期刊發(fā)表的數(shù)量。我的論文idea是利用強(qiáng)化學(xué)習(xí)解決不平衡分類問題,將分類問題分解為一個(gè)競(jìng)猜(分類)游戲問題,智能體每分對(duì)一個(gè)少數(shù)類,給予較高的獎(jiǎng)勵(lì),分錯(cuò)則給予較高的懲罰,對(duì)于多數(shù)類給予較低的獎(jiǎng)賞和懲罰。最后實(shí)驗(yàn)效果也特別好。論文已經(jīng)放在arxiv上了,計(jì)算機(jī)的大佬們可以幫忙瞄一瞄。。。希望推薦一些符合不平衡分類方向并且難度不大的sci期刊,樓主現(xiàn)在研二下,馬上要開始找實(shí)習(xí)了,而學(xué)院畢業(yè)要求是一篇sci論文。 論文arxiv鏈接 期刊名 影響因子 JCR分區(qū)(學(xué)院按照這個(gè)分區(qū)) 中科院分區(qū) Neurocomputing 3.241 1區(qū) 2區(qū) Neural Networks 7.197 1區(qū) 2區(qū) Pattern Recognition 3.962 1區(qū) 2區(qū) expert systems with applications 3.768 1區(qū) 2區(qū) Knowledge-based Systems 4.396 1區(qū) 2區(qū) IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2.775 1區(qū) 2區(qū) Applied Soft Computing 3.907 1區(qū) 2區(qū) Soft Computing 2.204 2區(qū) 3區(qū) Pattern Recognition Letters 1.952 2區(qū) 3區(qū) Information Sciences 4.305 1區(qū) 2區(qū) 這篇論文從做實(shí)驗(yàn)到撰寫英文論文花了半年多的時(shí)間,也學(xué)會(huì)不少東西,比如latex排版、論文矢量圖制作和文獻(xiàn)查找等,這個(gè)過程全是個(gè)人摸索,但是投稿階段導(dǎo)師還是沒有什么指導(dǎo),現(xiàn)在被拒了她叫我找次一點(diǎn)的期刊,可我真的不太懂這些問題啊,不清楚難度和投稿周期。寫作論文時(shí)每次寫完發(fā)給她就一大片一片地刪除掉讓我改改改,有時(shí)覺得她改得不好都無法反駁,叫我做的實(shí)驗(yàn)也是不考慮難度。!,F(xiàn)在又讓我重新將論文翻譯成中文發(fā)給她,簡(jiǎn)直煩死了,這個(gè)年真不好過。。。大家的導(dǎo)師是不是都這樣,算了,吐槽完畢還是得修改翻譯。。。希望有計(jì)算機(jī)的大佬們指導(dǎo)一下(如果瞄一下我arxiv上的論文更好)推薦一些符合的期刊給我。。。 一下是審稿意見(非常打擊): Thank you for submitting your work to Neurocomputing. Your manuscript has been considered by the Neurocomputing editorial board and we regret to inform you that we not consider it further as a submission to Neurocomputing. Neurocomputing receives an extremely large number of papers on various areas in neural networks and learning systems; as a result, the threshold for acceptance is high and we have to prescreen all submissions to determine it's fitting to Neurocomputing. The associate editor handling the review suggests submitting it to a more specialized journal.This suggestion has been echoed by the fact that there are very few recent Neurocomputing papers in the references.(實(shí)際上一篇都沒有 )In order to allow you to submit the work to a more suitable journal as soon as possible, no further processing of the manuscript will take place. We are sorry not to have better news for you on this occasion and hope you will find success in publishing your work elsewhere. Once again, thank you for choosing Neurocomputing to submit your scientific work. Please consider Neurocomputing for your future papers that report works of interest to the general readership of Neural Networks and Learning Systems Kind regards, Editor-in-Chief Neurocomputing Editor's comments: Review comments: First of all, we would like to thank the authors for submitting their paper to NEUROCOMPUTING. Despite having some interesting ideas, the manuscript has the following critical limitations: 1) Lack of scientific novelty and contributions: the scientific novelty is limited, the technical contributions (heuristic methodology without sound theory justification) are rather weak, and the impact in either theoretical or empirical results is not significant enough for a premier journal publication. 2) Clarity and presentation: the paper is not clearly presented, there are quite a lot of English writing errors/typos, the presentation is not satisfied. Overall, the quality of this submission is clearly below the acceptance bar, and we regret that we could not recommend publishing this manuscript for the journal. We hope that this decision does not deter you from submitting to us again, and thank you for your interest in the NEUROCOMPUTING. |
|
加油修改吧,現(xiàn)在理論創(chuàng)新很難。但是你可以換個(gè)角度說你做的東西,跟其他人相比你設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)驗(yàn)或是思路的優(yōu)勢(shì),解決了別人沒有或是解決不了的問題,中過兩篇neurocomputing,感覺其中一篇理論創(chuàng)新很小,就是實(shí)驗(yàn)多 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
我11月份也被neurocomputing拒了,也是編輯審了3周,沒送外審。這個(gè)期刊要求還是挺高的,我已轉(zhuǎn)投三區(qū)期刊 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |

新蟲 (文壇精英)
|
再改改換期刊重投就行了,半個(gè)月拒稿挺好的,我經(jīng)歷過11個(gè)半月被拒,還是兩篇,其實(shí)拒稿也不是說你水平不行,只是沒有引起編輯或?qū)徃迦诉@么少數(shù)幾個(gè)人的興趣而已 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 337求調(diào)劑 +4 | 《樹》 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +5 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 375求調(diào)劑 +4 | 雨夏整夜 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +9 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +7 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +7 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +10 | jjjjjjjjjjl 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉柯@ 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大071010,316分求調(diào)劑 +3 | xgbiknn 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | Ymlll 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +7 | prayer13 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 081700 調(diào)劑 267分 +11 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +4 | L when 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +3 | iwinso 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩找調(diào)劑 +5 | 哈哈哈吼吼吼哈 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|