| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4331 | 回復(fù): 19 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問(wèn)題,作者whilst將贈(zèng)送您 20 個(gè)金幣 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
whilst新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
投稿AFM被拒 一小修一大修一拒 還有必要argue嗎 已有3人參與
|
|
|
請(qǐng)各位幫我看看這種情況有必要argue嗎?上訴有希望嗎? Reviewer #1: This research reported the amino phosphonic acid resin as host to solve the lithium anode issues in LMBs. The APAR represents 3D and lithiophilic features, which is benefit to the absorption and deposition of Li. The results of experiments and computational simulation indicated the advantages of APAR in LMBs. However, the essence of the manuscript is just the common design of 3D lithiophilic host, which is not innovation enough for the current researches in LMBs. Meanwhile, the electrochemical performances of half and symmetrical cells in Figure 5 are also not good enough compared to other reported published literature. Therefore, it is not recommended to publish this manuscript in Advanced Functional Materials. Reviewer #2: The manuscript reports the application of cross-linked lithiophilic amino phosphonic acid resin as the effective host material for the lithium metal batteries. The half-cell shows a Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 98.8% over 130 cycles. The symmetrical cell exhibits stable cycling lifetime over 1150 hours with small voltage hysteresis of 16 mV. I would like to give a favorable recommendation if the authors address the following issues in a revision. 1. This has confused me for a long time, what are the actual differences between the Li-metal anodes with host materials and the graphite anodes. The theoretical capacity and potential have both weighed in the evaluation of the significances of the pure Li metal anode. Please provide the surface loading of the Li on the APAR host, and the theoretical capacity of this anode. 2. All the adsorption energies in Figure 4 are positive. A positive adsorption energy means that the adsorbate is thermodynamically unfavorable to be absorbed on the substrates. I guess the authors messed up with the sign of adsorption energies. The authors should refer to the comprehensive review (Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 264-279) about DFT calculations for battery materials. 3. In Figure 5f, the Cu@Li symmetric cell with the widely used ether based electrolyte (with 1 wt% LiNO3) exhibits the worst cycling stability that I has ever seen. 4. The author have some errors and typos in main text and reference section. Please carefully revise the manuscript. Reviewer #3: This manuscript reported that the dendrite growth of lithium metal anode was supressed by using cross-linked lithiophilic amino phosphonic acid resin (APAR) with Li+-pumping feature as the effective host. The Li-O2 full cells with APAR@Li anodes and Super P cathodes deliver high energy density and good cyclability due to the high reversibility of APAR@Li was applied. The working mechanism of APAR was demonstrated by DFT calculations and finite element simulation. This study reported a novel strategy for suppressing dendritic Li growth by guiding high and uniform Li+ concentration distribution at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The paper is well structured and provided a clear interpretation to help us understand the function of lithiophilic polymer in the suppression of lithium dendrite, therefore, I recommend the paper could be published in AFM with minor revision. 1. In Figure S5, the high Zeta potential of 3D APAR scaffold (nearly +33 mV) in the electrolyte confirms its strong affinity towards Li+ ions. Whether the absorption is from both physical absorption or chemical absorption? The pore volume of the 3D APAR scaffold should be measured to estimate the physical absorption if the equipment is available. 2. In this manuscript, experimental results give a clear evidence that the APAR can mitigate the volume change of the Li metal anode in Figure 2n. The detailed interpretation of how the APAR mitigate the volume change of lithium metal anode should be provided. 3. In Figure 5e, please explain why the impedance of APAR@Li decreases after cycling. |
新蟲 (小有名氣)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
金蟲 (著名寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)學(xué)碩080502 337求調(diào)劑-一志愿華中科技大學(xué) +4 | 順順順mr 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +10 | yy要上岸呀 2026-03-17 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +4 | ydfyh 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑 +12 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué),080502,354分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 守候夕陽(yáng)CF 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +10 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩英一數(shù)二306 +7 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +16 | 于海海海海 2026-03-19 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 北科281學(xué)碩材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | tcxiaoxx 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料求調(diào)劑,一志愿武漢理工085601專碩 +5 | Charlieyq 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 086500 325 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 領(lǐng)帶小熊 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)]
學(xué)校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC,還能修改嗎?
40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué) 305求調(diào)劑 +4 | FY_yy 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601專碩,總分342求調(diào)劑,地區(qū)不限 +5 | share_joy 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +11 | zjl的號(hào) 2026-03-16 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5 | 素年祭語(yǔ) 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程315分求調(diào)劑 +3 | yang_0104 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|