| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2580 | 回復: 8 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者yuanye2010將贈送您 20 個金幣 | ||
yuanye2010金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
SCI二審大修意見如下,三審半個月變Ready for decision,當天又變成 Decision Pending 已有1人參與
|
|
|
三審半個月變成Ready for decision,當天又變成 Decision Pending。∏髱熜謳熃惴治鱿陆Y(jié)果!謝謝 要靠他畢業(yè)! 二審追加了兩次審稿人后四個審稿人意見如下: Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to:3篇參考文獻 愛斯維爾這個這次接收的紀律大嗎???已經(jīng) Decision Pending !謝謝 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
看評價沒什么問題 第一個和最后一個審稿人都相對容易 第二個仔細想想,好好回復,也能解決 樓主加油! |
金蟲 (小有名氣)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 學碩274求調(diào)劑 +9 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +4 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 爭取九點睡 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +5 | 愛羈絆 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機化學 +3 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿太原理工安全工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 0857求調(diào)劑. 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +7 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
|
孅華 2026-03-22 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑(080500) +4 | A child 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 279 分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睡個好覺_16 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[論文投稿] Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology +3 | Russ_ss 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大071010,316分求調(diào)劑 +3 | xgbiknn 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 325求調(diào)劑 +3 | Aoyijiang 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1() 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 361求調(diào)劑 +3 | Glack 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學085700資源與環(huán)境,總分308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|