版塊導(dǎo)航: 正在加載中...

應(yīng)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未進(jìn)行實(shí)名認(rèn)證將不得使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)跟帖服務(wù)。為保障您的帳號(hào)能夠正常使用，請(qǐng)盡快對(duì)帳號(hào)進(jìn)行手機(jī)號(hào)驗(yàn)證，感謝您的理解與支持！

24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜

北京石油化工學(xué)院2026年研究生招生接收調(diào)劑公告

返回列表

ssjcumt

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 50.9
散金: 120
帖子: 167
在線: 48.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1420773
注冊(cè): 2011-09-28
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

[交流] IEEE Comm. letter, rejected & resubmission allowed,修改稿可超四頁嗎？

按照審稿人要求感覺肯定四頁不夠用，修改稿可以超過四頁嗎？
如果改投，這種四五頁的短文還有哪些雜志可以接收？請(qǐng)大神幫著推薦幾家。
另外，這種 rejected & resubmissin有多大希望呢？

三個(gè)審稿人，一個(gè)意見是“the performance of the proposed protocol has to be compared with a benchmark scheme where the 。。。。�！�，但是這個(gè)review要求進(jìn)行對(duì)比的這個(gè)benchmark和我的雖然有點(diǎn)類似，但是其實(shí)沒有什么可比性。
另外一個(gè)說我的其中一個(gè)參數(shù)假設(shè)的太理想化了，不太合理（其實(shí)我另外一篇也是這個(gè)假設(shè)，審稿人也沒說什么），也提到了要我跟別人的方案去比較。
第三個(gè)審稿人意見特別多，寫了兩頁，其他的問題都好回答，就其中一條比較難對(duì)付，是說我的為什么要這么做？方案為什么這么設(shè)計(jì)。其實(shí)沒有辦法證明這個(gè)方案最優(yōu)，因?yàn)槲沂鞘紫仍谶@種實(shí)際環(huán)境下提方案的。

“研究有沒有意義”這種問題，考慮角度不同，結(jié)論也不同。
請(qǐng)問大家，我這種情況，還有修改的價(jià)值么？感覺審稿人對(duì)我的研究領(lǐng)域還挺熟悉。像“the assumption seems too ideal.”，“the usefulness of the proposed protocol”這樣的問題，應(yīng)該從哪兒入手呢？

編輯來信如下：

Dear Author(s):

The review of the referenced manuscript, CL2015-2411, is now complete. I regret to inform you that based on the enclosed reviews and my own reading of your manuscript, I am unable to recommend its publication in IEEE Communications Letters.

You may revise and resubmit your manuscript to IEEE Communications Letters. When you do so, please include a cover letter that indicates the new submission is a revision of an earlier manuscript and the reference number of that prior manuscript. Also include as a supporting document a point-by-point response to the comments of the reviewers and the editor. The responses to comments file must be uploaded in PDF format in the same section in your submission as the body of your paper in ScholarOne Manuscripts, and not under the cover letter.  Please also be aware that ALL submissions to IEEE Communications letters must complete the Electronic Copyright Process.

If you decide to resubmit your manuscript you should complete the resubmission through the Manuscript Central. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions" under My Manuscripts on the left side of your Author Dashboard and then click on "Create a Resubmission" under the Actions Column next to your manuscript.

Your resubmission will be due within 75 days and is due on 10-Feb-2016. Please ensure that your revision is submitted in a timely manner as the web-based system will not allow a revision to enter the system after 75 days have elapsed. Please be aware that the time at which your revision permission will expire is 11:59 PM EST on the 75th day.

Note, that according to the IEEE COMML policy, the maximum number of permitted resubmissions after a Reject-Resubmission Allowed decision is one (1) and the maximum number of permitted Minor Revisions is (2).

Additional comments include:

I have been able to obtain 3 reviews for this manuscript. Although the reviewers agree that this is an interesting work, they nevertheless provide comments for improving the manuscript and pinpoint some issues that need to be addressed. Addressing the reviewers\' comments requires a major revision of the manuscript. For the potential resubmission, please provide point-to-point responses to all of the reviewers\' concerns, and modify the paper where necessary.

The reviewers\' comments are found at the end of this email.

Thank you for submitting your work to the IEEE Communications Letters.

Regards,
Nikola Zlatanov

Editor
IEEE Communications Letters

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This paper investigates the performance analysis of a practical tow-way protocol which takes a joint consideration of the ﬁnite relay buffer, signalling overhead and lossy link. The basis of analysis is a Markov chain model of the proposed protocol. The paper is well-written and the analyses sound.

The proposed protocol is very simple (which is good in part) and has to be compared with the best benchmark schemes in the literature. The author claim that the quality of the links are taken into account but it seems that the resulting contribution is very narrow in the proposed protocol. In fact, from Fig. 2, the relay always transmits if he has something in both queues. That is why the states (l,k) where both l and k are bigger than one do not exist. Therefore, the performance of the proposed protocol has to be compared with a benchmark scheme where the users and the relay are selected for transmission based on the qualities of the links (all states (l,k) are then present). It seems that reference [8] has already investigated this case for the ideal scenario where the signaling overhead is not taken into account. This protocol can serve at least as an upper bound.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
This paper considers a practical two-way relay protocol and proposes a Markov chain model to analyze this protocol. The closed form expressions for the throughput and delay are derived. I have the following comments.
1. In Section II-A, the authors propose a practical BNC protocol. However, it seems to me that it is just a threshold-based scheduling policy, where the threshold is 1 packet. The process of this protocol, e.g., waiting time slots, ACK/NACKs, is only an implementation of the threshold-based policy. Moreover, why the threshold is chosen to be 1 packet? Intuitively, the threshold should be chosen based on the link quality statistics, i.e., the successful packet rate in this manuscript. In addition, the Markov chain model and the analysis in the following sections highly depend on the protocol with this particular threshold. Therefore, the usefulness of the proposed protocol and the analysis in this manuscript appears to be questionable.
2. The authors state that they consider overflow probabilities in the abstract, the last paragraph in Section III, and the conclusion. However, throughout this manuscript, I cannot find any discussion or analysis about buffer overflow, which is an important issue in finite buffer systems. Actually, from the transition probability in Eq. (2), we can see that the impact of buffer overflow is ignored。
3. According the BNC protocol and the Markov chain in Fig. 2, there are only 2(L+K) states. However, in Eq. (5), (7), and Eq. (8), it appears to me that the authors consider (L+1)×(K +1) states. Please clarify it.
4.這一條是要我證明一個(gè)公式。很容易就證明了。
5. Minor comments:
1) In the introduction, the definition of BNC and the difference between BNC and PNC are not clearly illustrated.
2) In Section II-A, the authors consider packet transmission, however, using the XOR operation in bit layer, i.e., BNC. Please clarify this confusion.
3) In Page 6/11, Line 14, what is the meaning of traditional scheduling?
4) In Section II-B, what is the duration of a time slot? Do you consider a slotted system? This should be introduced in Section II-A.
5) In Fig. 2, the two rightmost states in the first and second lines should be (0,K) and (1, K).
6) In Page 7/11, Line 34, the definitions of SiU and SiR can hardly be understood.
7) In Eq. (4), what are the state spaces of i and j?
8) In Page 7/11, Line 48, please specify the location of the method in [10].
9) In Page 8/11, Line 18, the definition of the throughput is missing.
10) In Page 8/11, Line 18 and Line 24, what are the meanings of the duration of each packet and the average duration of one packet?
11) Section III is not well organized. I suggest the authors to summarize the results for the symmetric case in a lemma.
12) In Eq. (18), what is the summation taken over?

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
This paper studied two-way relay channel with finite relay buffer using Markov model.

However, the following questions should be carefully revised.

First, a lot of  works investigated  the  buffering with network coding by using Markov method. So the differences of the work compared with existing ones should be clearly summarized in order to outline the contribution of the paper.

Second, it is assumed that A and B has infinite buffer and always has data to be transmitted. Compared with some existing works, where the sources were assumed with  finite buffer or with some stochastic data arriving,  the assumption in this paper seems too ideal.

Thirdly, more simulation results on comparison with other  protocols with network coding and buffering should be provided.

Fourthly, the protocol in this paper should be described more clearly.  For example, the description of “In contrast to the traditional scheduling, the scheduling messages in this protocol are replaced by the waiting timeslot, and
the ACK/NACKs from R  to A  and B  are piggybacked by the next packets. These can save a considerable signaling overhead (the preamble).”  is not clear enough.

回復(fù)此樓

» 猜你喜歡

309求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
一志愿南航 335分 | 0856 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
求化學(xué)調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
085600，材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
0703 化學(xué) 求調(diào)劑，一志愿山東大學(xué) 342 分已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
一志愿南開大學(xué)0710生物學(xué)359求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
085600，專業(yè)課化工原理，320分求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
290求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)

» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:

IEEE Comm. letter, rejected & resubmission allowed, 請(qǐng)教修改稿上傳形式？已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
IEEE (COMM. Lett.)投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn) 已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
Awaiting Reviewer Selection兩周了能不能聯(lián)系一下editor 已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
我很囧~ 之千萬別學(xué)我(5), 當(dāng) reviewer 的心路歷程 (中級(jí)學(xué)者必看心得)— 自我行銷篇已經(jīng)有41人回復(fù)
Ieee wireless communications letters 是SCI 么已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享,IEEE Trans On CAS PAR II. 已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
中國計(jì)算機(jī)學(xué)會(huì)推薦國際學(xué)術(shù)刊物與會(huì)議網(wǎng)絡(luò)與信息安全已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
IEEE SPL 論文被拒已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
【轉(zhuǎn)帖】TD-LTE成功將給WiMAX致命一擊：先發(fā)優(yōu)勢(shì)漸失已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
【轉(zhuǎn)帖】40G/100G以太網(wǎng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制訂正式啟動(dòng) 已經(jīng)有1人回復(fù)

1樓 2015-12-02 17:07:01

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 顯示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

whcyb

木蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 1368.1
散金: 2200
紅花: 1
帖子: 185
在線: 191.4小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 2785795
注冊(cè): 2013-11-07
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★ ★ ★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖
ssjcumt: 金幣+2, 大修已經(jīng)回來了，現(xiàn)在在小修中 2016-02-02 17:50:56

這種情況就是大修，好好改會(huì)接收的，建議改后重投

發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端

贊一下(2人)

回復(fù)此樓

落了的東西得落下才知道落下了

2樓2015-12-02 17:42:52

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zbconquer

木蟲 (正式寫手)

應(yīng)助: 77 (初中生)
金幣: 1901.1
散金: 1105
紅花: 25
帖子: 843
在線: 411.7小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 693619
注冊(cè): 2009-01-16
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

引用回帖:

17樓: Originally posted by ssjcumt at 2016-01-30 15:28:45
謝謝大神的指點(diǎn)，現(xiàn)在文章又被打回來了。給了21天的修改時(shí)間，
三個(gè)審稿人中有兩個(gè)說對(duì)文章很滿意，另外一個(gè)又找出了幾個(gè)問題，貌似是小問題了。
我現(xiàn)在修改提交后，還會(huì)是三個(gè)審稿人都要重審嗎？還是只有這個(gè)有 ...

這意見還不一致啊，基本就是接收了。恭喜
只需要回復(fù)下reviewer2就行，不用管其他兩個(gè)reviewer，按照reviewer2的意見再修正一下就可以了。
一般這種情況，editior看一看就完了，很少再返回給reviewer了，當(dāng)然也不會(huì)再返回給reviewer 1 和 3了。

贊一下(2人)

回復(fù)此樓

18樓2016-01-30 21:28:39

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

匿名

用戶注銷 (著名寫手)

應(yīng)助: 131 (高中生)
金幣: 58.2
散金: 647
紅花: 21
帖子: 1540
在線: 578.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 0
注冊(cè): 2012-02-12
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

本帖僅樓主可見

贊一下

3樓2015-12-02 19:31:33

已閱申請(qǐng)SEPI 回復(fù)此樓編輯查看我的主頁

whcyb

木蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 1368.1
散金: 2200
紅花: 1
帖子: 185
在線: 191.4小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 2785795
注冊(cè): 2013-11-07
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

引用回帖:

6樓: Originally posted by ssjcumt at 2015-12-02 20:38:47
多謝哈。
所有的reviewer都沒有直接說reject，只是說需要做那些改動(dòng)那些補(bǔ)充。但是editor還是reject了，另外，我認(rèn)識(shí)這個(gè)editor（他不認(rèn)識(shí)我哈），他對(duì)我這塊挺熟的。editor是不是有偏見呢？
郵件抄送給了三 ...

editor一般不會(huì)有偏見的吧。另外，你確定郵件抄送的其他人不是主編和adm？雙盲審的期刊怎么會(huì)把審稿人的郵件地址給你看到~~目前接收短文的知道的只有TVT（6頁），Spl，ieee wireless communication letter（非sci，創(chuàng)刊時(shí)間太短，但檢索遲早的事），還有一個(gè)是ieice t communication(15年10月1號(hào)開始接收四頁，要差一點(diǎn)，日本的，發(fā)文要會(huì)員)。所以，還是建議改改重投吧，把一些不重要的要舍得刪，精簡(jiǎn)一下。中的概率還是非常高的。

發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

落了的東西得落下才知道落下了

7樓2015-12-02 21:12:55

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zbconquer

木蟲 (正式寫手)

應(yīng)助: 77 (初中生)
金幣: 1901.1
散金: 1105
紅花: 25
帖子: 843
在線: 411.7小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 693619
注冊(cè): 2009-01-16
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★ ★ ★ ★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖
ssjcumt: 金幣+3, 大神的回復(fù)很有幫助 2016-01-06 12:31:33

引用回帖:

4樓: Originally posted by ssjcumt at 2015-12-02 20:13:17
resubmission的時(shí)候，還是單雙欄都要有吧？（單欄便于審稿，雙欄是正式的）。
假如我為了壓縮到四頁，而把一些段落進(jìn)行精簡(jiǎn)壓縮，那么這些變動(dòng)（不是response），還需要注明嗎？
如果需要注明的話，是在response ...

cover letter主要是給editor看的，總結(jié)改動(dòng)情況。
給reviewer的response中最好寫清楚，他的這條comments是怎么incorporate到revised version中的（用顏色highlight改動(dòng)）

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

9樓2015-12-02 21:58:42

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zbconquer

木蟲 (正式寫手)

應(yīng)助: 77 (初中生)
金幣: 1901.1
散金: 1105
紅花: 25
帖子: 843
在線: 411.7小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 693619
注冊(cè): 2009-01-16
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

引用回帖:

Editor是Nikola Zlatanov，當(dāng)然對(duì)finite relay buffer熟了。
CL除了收就是據(jù)，據(jù)還包括允許重投和不允許重投。
允許重投差不多就是大改了（editor的郵件里也了major revision）

引EIC和managing editor的論文能有啥用。。。

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

10樓2015-12-02 22:02:11

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zldrobit

新蟲 (初入文壇)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 16
帖子: 11
在線: 14.7小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 2633208
注冊(cè): 2013-09-03
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

我記得我重投CL的時(shí)候是按照審稿人的意見比較了別人的protocol的，性能沒有別人好，不過在response和修改manuscript的introduction里說明了原因：即使別人protocol的吞吐量比自己的大，但是同時(shí)別人的開銷特別大。希望能給樓主一點(diǎn)幫助。。。
另外關(guān)于CL限制4頁長度的問題，好像投稿系統(tǒng)是不支持長于4頁的文章的。
但是我自己的就比4頁長，后來是用了latex的包縮減了很多空白，（例如：圖和標(biāo)題，標(biāo)題和正文之間）才排到4頁的，樓主也可以試一下呢。

ps:自己的CL重投還沒有最終結(jié)果呢。。。

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

13樓2016-01-04 14:31:04

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

zbking

鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)

應(yīng)助: 46 (小學(xué)生)
金幣: 10225.9
散金: 19
紅花: 8
帖子: 875
在線: 867.1小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 2524034
注冊(cè): 2013-06-27
性別: GG
專業(yè): 計(jì)算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

引用回帖:

14樓: Originally posted by ssjcumt at 2016-01-06 12:16:32
我在修改的過程中得到了benchmark作者的建議和幫助，但是這個(gè)人不肯作為我這篇文章的一個(gè)作者。這個(gè)人是我這篇文章的編輯的師弟，因?yàn)槲铱吹剿麄兒献鲗懥撕脦灼猅rans。
因?yàn)槭敲�，所以提交的正文里面無法對(duì)他進(jìn) ...

如果文章質(zhì)量過硬的話，根本就不用管引用什么編輯或者主編的論文（如果人家沒主動(dòng)踢出來的話），或者一些其它七里八里的；修改提供幫助的話再最終版里面感謝下就是了（如果錄用），至于Cover Letter提不提根本沒必要，況且編輯和那個(gè)作者也只是合作關(guān)系，甚至于可能沒那么熟，文章的最終命運(yùn)還是看審稿人回來的意見，樓主想的太多了。。。

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

15樓2016-01-06 14:49:57

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

ssjcumt

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 50.9
散金: 120
帖子: 167
在線: 48.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1420773
注冊(cè): 2011-09-28
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

引用回帖:

2樓: Originally posted by whcyb at 2015-12-02 17:42:52
這種情況就是大修，好好改會(huì)接收的，建議改后重投

不可思議，竟然接收了。自己都感覺幸運(yùn)。多謝您的鼓勵(lì)。不然一篇sci就沒了。

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

19樓2016-03-04 21:11:01

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

普通回帖

ssjcumt

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 50.9
散金: 120
帖子: 167
在線: 48.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1420773
注冊(cè): 2011-09-28
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

引用回帖:

3樓: Originally posted by zhangtt2012 at 2015-12-02 19:31:33
不能超過4頁。4頁說不清楚的話，趁早改投。

resubmission的時(shí)候，還是單雙欄都要有吧？（單欄便于審稿，雙欄是正式的）。
假如我為了壓縮到四頁，而把一些段落進(jìn)行精簡(jiǎn)壓縮，那么這些變動(dòng)（不是response），還需要注明嗎？
如果需要注明的話，是在response文檔里面呢，還是cover letter里面呢？因?yàn)檫@些變動(dòng)不是針對(duì)某一個(gè)reviewer的。
另外，針對(duì)reviewer的response需要在原文中hightlight嗎？比如紅色字體之類的。

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

4樓2015-12-02 20:13:17

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

ssjcumt

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 50.9
散金: 120
帖子: 167
在線: 48.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1420773
注冊(cè): 2011-09-28
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

引用回帖:

3樓: Originally posted by zhangtt2012 at 2015-12-02 19:31:33
不能超過4頁。4頁說不清楚的話，趁早改投。

按照reviewer的意見進(jìn)行修改后也就五頁，發(fā)正式的journal還是不行，能推薦個(gè)接收這種短文的期刊嗎？多謝了。改投的話就不考慮其中不合理的comments了，四頁也是放得下。
我不想花精力去擴(kuò)充了，現(xiàn)在正在寫大論文。

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

5樓2015-12-02 20:19:21

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

ssjcumt

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 50.9
散金: 120
帖子: 167
在線: 48.2小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 1420773
注冊(cè): 2011-09-28
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

引用回帖:

2樓: Originally posted by whcyb at 2015-12-02 17:42:52
這種情況就是大修，好好改會(huì)接收的，建議改后重投

多謝哈。
所有的reviewer都沒有直接說reject，只是說需要做那些改動(dòng)那些補(bǔ)充。但是editor還是reject了，另外，我認(rèn)識(shí)這個(gè)editor（他不認(rèn)識(shí)我哈），他對(duì)我這塊挺熟的。editor是不是有偏見呢？
郵件抄送給了三個(gè)人，一個(gè)給editor-in-chief，一個(gè)給managing editor，一個(gè)給他自己，如果我引用兩篇他們的文章會(huì)不會(huì)對(duì)接收有幫助？

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

6樓2015-12-02 20:38:47

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

whcyb

木蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 1368.1
散金: 2200
紅花: 1
帖子: 185
在線: 191.4小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 2785795
注冊(cè): 2013-11-07
性別: GG
專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)

★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖

引用回帖:

趕緊獻(xiàn)上你的膝蓋給editor吧，放心大膽的引吧

發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

落了的東西得落下才知道落下了

8樓2015-12-02 21:42:40

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn) 我要訂閱樓主 ssjcumt 的主題更新

返回列表

普通表情龍兔虎貓高級(jí)回復(fù) (可上傳附件)

最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部]		作者	回/看	最后發(fā)表

[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學(xué)有機(jī)化學(xué)專業(yè)，初試351分，復(fù)試被刷求調(diào)劑! +5	真名有冰 2026-03-29	6/300	2026-03-29 20:53 by 唐沐兒
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑，一志愿西北工業(yè)大學(xué)，材料工程（085601） +4	小小機(jī)靈蟲 2026-03-29	10/500	2026-03-29 18:20 by 無際的草原
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +10	15188958825 2026-03-25	10/500	2026-03-29 17:51 by 王亮_大連醫(yī)科大
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +5	BrightLL 2026-03-29	5/250	2026-03-29 17:24 by zhyzzh
[考研] 求收留 +5	1943443204 2026-03-28	5/250	2026-03-29 12:11 by 無際的草原
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +4	種圣賜 2026-03-28	4/200	2026-03-29 08:42 by q1092522407
[考研] 數(shù)一英一271專碩（085401）求調(diào)劑，可跨 +7	前行必有光 2026-03-28	8/400	2026-03-28 23:22 by 小木蟲tim
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +3	山頂見α 2026-03-25	3/150	2026-03-28 14:13 by 唐沐兒
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324 +7	閆旭東 2026-03-28	9/450	2026-03-28 08:51 by Xu de nuo
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4	丟掉懶惰 2026-03-27	7/350	2026-03-28 08:07 by baoball
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5	1428151015 2026-03-27	6/300	2026-03-28 04:04 by fmesaito
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4	零八# 2026-03-27	4/200	2026-03-27 18:07 by yu221
[考博] 26申博 +3	加油沖��！ 2026-03-26	3/150	2026-03-27 15:38 by cls512
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑 +5	求求讓我有書讀?/a> 2026-03-26	6/300	2026-03-27 15:12 by caszguilin
[考研] 求調(diào)劑323材料與化工 +7	1124361 2026-03-24	7/350	2026-03-27 10:22 by wangjy2002
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿本科北科大化學(xué) 343 +6	13831862839 2026-03-24	7/350	2026-03-26 22:57 by 不吃魚的貓
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 5+4	想要一壺桃花水 2026-03-25	10/500	2026-03-26 19:56 by 不吃魚的貓
[考研] 打過很多競(jìng)賽，085406控制工程300分，求調(diào)劑 +3	askeladz 2026-03-26	3/150	2026-03-26 09:08 by 給你你注意休息
[考研] 07化學(xué)303求調(diào)劑 +5	睿08 2026-03-25	5/250	2026-03-25 22:46 by 418490947
[考研] 考研一志愿蘇州大學(xué)初始315（英一）求調(diào)劑 +3	sbdksD 2026-03-24	4/200	2026-03-25 18:16 by xcjcqu