| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1924 | 回復(fù): 26 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問(wèn)題,作者EMT!將贈(zèng)送您 2 個(gè)金幣 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
EMT!新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
不明白審稿人的意見(jiàn),求助,在線等 已有1人參與
|
||
|
小弟做了一個(gè)普通的香腸,和一個(gè)用蘑菇替代肥肉和部分瘦肉的香腸(命名為novel sausage,利用響應(yīng)面法做出的最好的蘑菇替代的香腸),然后把兩者進(jìn)行了對(duì)比。投稿后審稿人有條意見(jiàn)是這樣的, If you take out all the fat and part of meat and replace it with mushrooms only to conclude that "novel sausage" has lower levels of fat, energy, and saturated fatty acid, but higher content of aspartic, glutamic, cysteine, methionine, proline, polyunsaturated fatty acid, and monounsaturated fatty acid then we must ask the authors what was the null hypothesis? Were they excepting a different conclusion? If not why prove the obvious? Yes, mushrooms have less fat, energy and saturated fatty acids then pork meat and fat and if you replace meat and fat from sausage with them was there a theoretical chance od discovering anything else but what's obvious? 請(qǐng)問(wèn)下劃線的地方該怎么理解呢?該怎么回復(fù)這位審稿人呢?大哥大嫂救救孩子 ![]() ![]() 急,在線等擔(dān)心金幣不夠不能回帖,簽到領(lǐng)取金幣后必送上小紅花。 |
哈哈哈哈。我以為你在類比,原來(lái)真的研究的是香腸啊 。按我的理解,我覺(jué)得他是這個(gè)意思,蘑菇本身就比肥肉脂肪低,所以你的蘑菇香腸肯定比普通香腸脂肪低,你要是得出結(jié)論你的香腸比肥肉香腸脂肪低那是顯而易見(jiàn)的。所以,你應(yīng)該突出你的新穎之處,你要強(qiáng)調(diào)以前沒(méi)人做過(guò)這個(gè)蘑菇香腸,你們成功做出來(lái)了,這種香腸脂肪更低,有啥啥好處![]() 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
新蟲 (小有名氣)
新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
就說(shuō)你結(jié)論太淺顯了,用一個(gè)脂肪少的蘑菇去部分代替肉腸里的肉,那就說(shuō)你這肉腸少脂了?至少也要說(shuō)明蘑菇加進(jìn)去后對(duì)這個(gè)腸的性質(zhì)有促進(jìn)或無(wú)任何不利影響或者說(shuō)加進(jìn)去的蘑菇能減輕高脂肉腸對(duì)人體的不利影響 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|