| 5 | 3/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 7132 | 回復(fù): 46 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問(wèn)題,作者bagzqab766將贈(zèng)送您 50 個(gè)金幣 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿(mǎn)足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
bagzqab766金蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
投了SCI小修后被拒,想問(wèn)下可以不可以發(fā)郵件給編輯申訴 已有19人參與
|
||
|
剛開(kāi)始給我的小修意見(jiàn)很好:“The referee(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the referee(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.” 但是小修后感覺(jué)重新外審換了一個(gè)審稿人: “Unfortunately there are already numerous studies that use robotic equipment; mostly a robotic arm; to facilitate the use of the study of technology in educational and academic environments. A quick search of the IEEE database will give you a large number of references in this regard. From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists. In recent years, the use of IoT technology has been linked to these experiences, with which your paper does not contribute anything new in that sense either. For this reason I must advise to reject your paper.” 我覺(jué)得我搞了半年時(shí)間,而且已經(jīng)小修了,怎么會(huì)出現(xiàn)完全不同的審稿意見(jiàn),想問(wèn)下這種情況可以找編輯申訴嗎? |
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (知名作家)
AP
|
放下吧,雖然很扯,但說(shuō)了創(chuàng)新性問(wèn)題基本就沒(méi)戲了 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)IOS客戶(hù)端 |

新蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)

金蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|