| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2162 | 回復(fù): 14 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
sybgyq木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
ScienceDirect 出版社文章接受后是什么處理流程 已有2人參與
|
||
|
近日收到aerospace science and technology 文章接受的通知。系統(tǒng)里面顯示accept. 但編輯的郵件主題是your submission 后面還有一個(gè)審稿人意見(jiàn)關(guān)于語(yǔ)言方面的。 我還需要修改嘛然后以郵件的方式回復(fù)他 因?yàn)橄到y(tǒng)里面沒(méi)有遞交這項(xiàng)。我該怎么處理 想請(qǐng)教一下。下面是編輯的郵件 這個(gè)期刊版面費(fèi)多少。多久檢索。我還需要做些什么。這個(gè)出版社第一次投 希望大神指點(diǎn) I am pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication in Aerospace Science and Technology. Below are comments from the editor and reviewers. Thank you for submitting your work to Aerospace Science and Technology. When your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit https://www.elsevier.com/audioslides. Yours sincerely, Associate Editor Aerospace Science and Technology Comments from the editors and reviewers: Reviewer #1: New signal design is a very important issue, so the subject addressed in this article is interested. This paper introduced a modulation family, and gave many analysis and simulation results to show its better navigation performance. Of course, in my opinion, whether it is effective in actual application should be tested in more practical platform but not only the simulation. I think the author responded very seriously to all the comments. By means of that, the contributions were clearer. The language was improved significantly. In my opinion, it can be accepted. Reviewer #4: Despite the English revision, I still find that there are some mistakes with usage. Some examples I found are: 1) In the abstract, the sentence starting "Theoretical analysis..." should have an "and" between "accuracy" and "multipath" instead of a comma 2) The first sentence of the introduction is an awkward start to a paper 3) After equation (1), should be "takes values of" not "takes value" Overall, I find the paper a bit difficult to read due to the many acronyms used repeatedly. Reviewer #5: No comments on this version of the manuscript. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
AP
|
系統(tǒng)里沒(méi)有提交選擇的話可以直接把修改稿發(fā)到編輯郵箱 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |

鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
AP

超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +4 | 來(lái)好運(yùn)來(lái)來(lái)來(lái) 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考博] 招收博士1-2人 +3 | QGZDSYS 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 山東省面上項(xiàng)目限額評(píng)審 +4 | 石瑞0426 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +11 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 初試 317 +7 | 半拉月丙 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +5 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎(jiǎng)覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研]
|
Grand777 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南大,0703化學(xué),分?jǐn)?shù)336,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 收到VS 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211 +14 | chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +9 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +4 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ^O^乜 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +7 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|