| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1540 | 回復(fù): 7 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
whjwd木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
數(shù)學(xué)論文,審稿人的意見沒看懂,求助 已有2人參與
|
|
|
投了一篇論文,審稿意見有這樣一段: the denominator in (2.7) decreases, bu the author fails to show that this expression does not vanish in the interval (0,1). without this the assertion in line 37 is not valid. 論文中的相關(guān)內(nèi)容如下: (2.7) it is not difficult to verify that the function on (0,1). hence (2.7) implies that the quotient accordingly, from lemma 2.1 and (2.6), it is deduced that the ratio increasing in (0; 1). 沒讀懂上面的審稿意見,求助大家,審稿人是什么意思? |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|