| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4558 | 回復(fù): 68 | |||
| 【有獎(jiǎng)交流】積極回復(fù)本帖子,參與交流,就有機(jī)會(huì)分得作者 wo1004 的 29 個(gè)金幣 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
這樣算不算一稿多投,怎么回復(fù)編輯。可⒔饚徘笾
|
|||
|
我之前發(fā)表了一篇SCI,進(jìn)行了力和溫度優(yōu)化,對(duì)同樣的力不同溫度,以及同樣溫度不同力進(jìn)行了SEM分析,四張圖。 現(xiàn)在又寫(xiě)了一篇SCI,不過(guò)是同一個(gè)試驗(yàn)。但是也進(jìn)行了溫度優(yōu)化,并把溫度對(duì)加工質(zhì)量的影響進(jìn)行了SEM分析,八張圖。 現(xiàn)在第二篇被外審?fù)嘶貋?lái)了,意見(jiàn)如下: The reviewers and editors of your manuscript have identified a significant and substantial deficiency of your submission. I have reached the decision that this submission should not be considered any further. For your guidance, the comments are included below. Reviewer #1:When looking over the submitted manuscript and researching background, I found a previous paper published by the authors (which is not in the list of references) and there is about 70-80% duplication of information between the two papers. The other paper is(我的第一篇) 我覺(jué)得試驗(yàn)分析的重復(fù)度沒(méi)有像他說(shuō)的70-80%,可能是試驗(yàn)方法相同所以顯得重復(fù)度高了。這種我應(yīng)該怎么回答,后果是不是很?chē)?yán)重? 求解救 |
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (知名作家)
|
, [ 發(fā)自手機(jī)版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|