各位老師好：

        最近投了一篇論文二審回來(lái)大修，有一個(gè)審稿人提了一個(gè)意見(jiàn)，我想了很久不知道怎么回復(fù)，只有這個(gè)審稿人有意見(jiàn)了。

各位老師能不能幫我看看怎么回復(fù)好，非常感激！

I commend the authors for addressing most problems raised in previous review, but I would like to recommend authors to submit this manuscript to a different journal that focuses more on applications than research. I also have following comments for authors, which are provided to improve the quality of this manuscript.

1. The research questions lack details and are rather problems oriented. 針對(duì)這一條我不知道該怎么回復(fù)審稿人。

下面是編輯的看法，他后面的那句話是不是可以對(duì)于回答這個(gè)問(wèn)題有點(diǎn)幫助。

I went through the paper myself. I can see noticeable amount of merit while agreeing with one referee that authors may wish to focus on in-depth research questions instead of focusing on a sophisticated math model and solution algorithm. If the authors prefer to focus on the model and solution, they should highlight their major contributions along this line. 返回小木蟲(chóng)查看更多