返修意見(jiàn)看不懂,求助各位,非常急。。。。
各位大神好。!
收到了 JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE返修郵件,其中審稿人對(duì)文章做了很多修改意見(jiàn),如下列表。其中5. Results and discussion:i. Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.我有點(diǎn)看不懂,不知道怎么回答,是不是比較一下我的工作和別人的工作,列個(gè)表在支撐文獻(xiàn)???
但是翻譯出來(lái)的結(jié)果是:尚未根據(jù)先前的研究對(duì)得到的結(jié)果進(jìn)行徹底的解釋。應(yīng)該這樣做以幫助顯示當(dāng)前研究對(duì)知識(shí)的貢獻(xiàn)程度?床欢,求教各位大神
Reviewer #1:
Reviewer No.1 Report.
Manuscript Number: JCIS-20-4021
Title: The fabrication of layered Fe2P -Cd0.5Zn0.5S nanoparticles with a reverse heterojunction toward enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution
A. General Comments.
The paper looked at the development of a two-dimensional (2D) layered Fe2P modified Cd0.5Zn0.5S (CZS) nanoparticles composites through an environmentally friendly solvothermal method. The manuscript is informative and will be interesting to readers. It however, has some short comings as itemized under specific comments. The English of the manuscript is fair but requires improvement. There was no continuous line numbering in the manuscript, thereby making reading and review difficult.
B. Specific Comments
1. Topic: See attached manuscript.
2. Introduction:
i. The gap in literature that necessitated the study was not well captured in the introduction. This makes it difficult to appreciate the extent of work done.
ii. See attached manuscript for details of other corrections
3. Keywords: Maximum of five keys is preferable.
4. Experimental: See attached manuscript for the required corrections
5. Results and discussion:
i. Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.
ii. The other corrections are written on the attached manuscript.
6. Conclusion: See attached manuscript.
7. Acknowledgment: See attached manuscript.
C. Recommendation
In view of the comments above, I recommend acceptance following a major correction.
Yours sincerely,
返回小木蟲(chóng)查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
與已有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)進(jìn)行對(duì)比,體現(xiàn)你的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)價(jià)值
沒(méi)解釋清楚結(jié)果,要解釋清楚才能體現(xiàn)出文章的價(jià)值
解釋你論文的突出點(diǎn),和別的比較
Owena
2020-08-19 22:47:05
3樓
沒(méi)解釋清楚結(jié)果,要解釋清楚才能體現(xiàn)出文章的價(jià)值 用之前的研究來(lái)解釋
是不是認(rèn)為你所做的研究與得出的成果,在論述中,相關(guān)的“論據(jù)”或者說(shuō)“理由”還不夠很充分呢?
就是你要做科學(xué),促進(jìn)領(lǐng)域進(jìn)步,不能只是數(shù)字高沒(méi)有證據(jù)支撐是真的高還是測(cè)錯(cuò)了還是挑了好的。
Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.
現(xiàn)在的結(jié)果需要同以前的結(jié)果進(jìn)行對(duì)比,清楚解釋目前的研究對(duì)你的研究領(lǐng)域有什么新的貢獻(xiàn),貢獻(xiàn)有多大,