Access重投被拒
Access一審重投后一個(gè)審稿人同意了,另外一個(gè)因?yàn)檫@些原因又把我拒了,大家怎么看,繼續(xù)投嗎,這個(gè)審稿人是不是就是不喜歡,再次把我拒了,愁。
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission)
Comments:
Some final cosmetic comments:
* Avoid using first person.
* Avoid using abbreviations and acronyms in title, abstract, headings and highlights.
* Please avoid having heading after heading with nothing in between, either merge your headings or provide a small paragraph in between.
* Abstract is too short. Abstract should have one sentence per each: context and background, motivation, hypothesis, methods, results, conclusions.
* The first time you use an acronym in the text, please write the full name and the acronym in parenthesis. Do not use acronyms in the title, abstract, chapter headings and highlights.
* The results should be further elaborated to show how they could be used for the real applications.
* The originality of the paper needs to be further clarified.
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
1. 格式 2. 語法 3. 摘要寫得不令他滿意 4. 質(zhì)疑你論文的創(chuàng)新性 5. 仿真結(jié)果的實(shí)時(shí)應(yīng)用?
這期刊沒有大修小修之類的,拒稿重投相當(dāng)于大修
茨慊旒P∧境嬲餉淳貌揮Ω檬切“裝。巧蟾迦碩閱懵畚男醋魈岢穌庋奈侍餑愫孟裥枰伎甲隕淼奈侍?论文写的是不蕵岧诱E盍,因而没能睗惋出你论文想睗惋诞鰨?/p>
嗯嗯
審稿意見中大部分問題,好像主要是出于你寫作的問題啊,還有像一些“格式”問題是不應(yīng)出那么多的。樓主加油哦!
IEEE Access重投被拒后就不能再投IEEE Access了
祝福