請(qǐng)幫我看看這個(gè)審稿意見是比較正面的還是負(fù)面的
Dear XXX,
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.
Reviewer #1: The manuscript addresses interactions of phosphorus and the zeolite/binder composites. In general agreeing that the literature lacks such types of studies shedding light on shaped catalyst bodies, it seems appropriate to point our few shortcoming of the work, which should be considered during the revision process.
返回小木蟲查看更多
今日熱帖
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
編輯是模板套話，審稿人1的評(píng)價(jià)很不錯(cuò)。按要求改，基本就中了
謝謝！借您吉言
，
第一位評(píng)審對(duì)你的文稿有相當(dāng)正面的回饋，表示你的研究有處理前人所未盡的地方。但可能會(huì)需要你在修改階段強(qiáng)調(diào)這個(gè)部分（磷與沸石/結(jié)合劑間的作用，這種研究在之前的文獻(xiàn)之中較少被討論到）讓催化劑成型體的領(lǐng)域有更進(jìn)一步的突破。
“You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript”編輯的用詞很溫和，認(rèn)真校正就沒有問題了
挺好的，discussion補(bǔ)充一些limitations，大概率是major revisions