第一個(gè)審稿人：While this is a well-written paper, there are some fundamental concerns that I categorise under two major titles: theoretical and methodological.
第二個(gè)審稿人: This paper is interesting. However, below I have some specific comments that might help improve the paper.
第三個(gè)審稿人: The topic and the overall framework are interesting. The paper is well-organized and fairly easy to navigate. However, there are several issues that have severely undermined its contributions to the literature.
雖然拒稿是個(gè)很常見(jiàn)的事情，對(duì)于科研人來(lái)說(shuō)但是還是有點(diǎn)傷心加失落啊。仔細(xì)研究了審稿人的意見(jiàn)，每個(gè)審稿人都提了六七個(gè)問(wèn)題，但是總體評(píng)價(jià)似乎還算積極的吧？由于是第一次SCI，對(duì)于審稿人評(píng)語(yǔ)不是很明白，比如“well-written”“interesting”對(duì)一篇文章是哪種程度的評(píng)價(jià)？是禮貌用語(yǔ)嗎？

 返回小木蟲(chóng)查看更多