求助大神,MDPI的materials審稿意見,在線等
如題,各位大神指教,第一次投materials,一路審稿走來,磕磕絆絆,現(xiàn)在有兩個審稿意見回來,不知道大家是怎么看出來審稿人的態(tài)度的(經(jīng)常看到有的人說一個接受一個拒稿之類的),我把兩個審稿人評價掛出來,大家?guī)兔聪?br />
審稿人1
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
審稿人2
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
這個是審稿人評價都不高嗎?第一個是拒了嗎?看他的意見,對結(jié)果好像有質(zhì)疑,第二個整體態(tài)度較好,補充幾個說明和實驗就好了,麻煩大家?guī)臀铱聪,科研小白在這里謝謝大家了
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
不用太擔心,只要發(fā)給你修改了那就是問題不是太大,認真改文章,回復問題就行了, 態(tài)度也是一重要的方面
論文給了修改機會就好好改。讓重投咱就修改后重投。大家都是這么過來的。
第一個審稿人有質(zhì)疑,讓補充實驗,還說結(jié)果是否有問題之類的,比較難改,這樣的問題,如果做不到,怎么回復?br>,
不用擔心這個,編輯既然給你修改機會,說明是有意錄用,好好修改就是
請教下,你需要給編輯發(fā)送作者聲明和所屬單位聲明掃描件嗎?