求助大神,MDPI的materials審稿意見,在線等
如題,各位大神指教,第一次投materials,一路審稿走來,磕磕絆絆,現(xiàn)在有兩個審稿意見回來,不知道大家是怎么看出來審稿人的態(tài)度的(經(jīng)?吹接械娜苏f一個接受一個拒稿之類的),我把兩個審稿人評價掛出來,大家?guī)兔聪?br />
審稿人1
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
審稿人2
Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
這個是審稿人評價都不高嗎?第一個是拒了嗎?看他的意見,對結(jié)果好像有質(zhì)疑,第二個整體態(tài)度較好,補(bǔ)充幾個說明和實(shí)驗(yàn)就好了,麻煩大家?guī)臀铱聪,科研小白在這里謝謝大家了
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
好好改,有希望,既然沒拒稿,肯定編輯會針對你作出修改去判斷。同時請教下,materials審稿是個什么狀態(tài),看得見嗎?你需要上傳掃描作者聲明和所屬機(jī)構(gòu)聲明嗎?
,
接受了嗎 最后
這個期刊不是上了預(yù)警名單了嘛