一審稿大修,各位大神給看看,幫忙提一提意見,謝謝!
這是一個審稿人給的4條意見,編輯給了大修,各位大神給看看,幫忙提一提意見,謝謝!
1) The objective, methodology, and results should be better described, discussed and justified
2) The current literature review is not sufficient. For example, please mention (give) following more current studies related to ground heat exchangers and thermal energy storage by PCMs in the sections of Introduction, and References List for completeness of your study and the references:
- Numerical and experimental analysis of a horizontal ground-coupled heat pump system, Building and Environment, 42(3), 1126-1134 (2007).
- Energy and exergy analysis of a ground-coupled heat pump system with two horizontal ground heat exchangers, Building and Environment, 42(10), 3606-3615 (2007).
- Modelling and experimental performance analysis of solar-assisted ground source heat pump system, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 29(1), 1-17 (2017).
- Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse, Energy and Buildings, 65, 340-351 (2013).
- Development of a model compatible with solar assisted cylindrical energy storage tank and variation of stored energy with time for different phase change materials, Energy Conversion and Management, 37(12), 1775-1785 (1996).
- Geometric design of solar-aided latent heat store depending on various parameters and phase change materials, Solar Energy, 62(1), 19-28 (1998).
- Thermal performance of a solar-aided latent heat store used for space heating by heat pump, Solar Energy, 69(1), 15-25 (2000).
3) The results should be expanded significantly and quantitatively.
4) I strongly suggest that authors shall carry out more studies to compare the results from this paper to that from other similar studies.
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
瓷蟾逡餳顧憧梢,好好皽愓审稿茵h陌!抠犥改得有甸純,但首l蟛糠值穆畚腶ccept前不是這樣改出來的呢!加油共勉!
,
這個讓引用的也是無敵了,幾乎全是同一個人的文章。