剛開(kāi)始給我的小修意見(jiàn)很好：“The referee(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the referee(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.”

但是小修后感覺(jué)重新外審換了一個(gè)審稿人：
“Unfortunately there are already numerous studies that use robotic equipment; mostly a robotic arm; to facilitate the use of the study of technology in educational and academic environments. A quick search of the IEEE database will give you a large number of references in this regard.
From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists.
In recent years, the use of IoT technology has been linked to these experiences, with which your paper does not contribute anything new in that sense either.
For this reason I must advise to reject your paper.”
我覺(jué)得我搞了半年時(shí)間，而且已經(jīng)小修了，怎么會(huì)出現(xiàn)完全不同的審稿意見(jiàn)，想問(wèn)下這種情況可以找編輯申訴嗎？ 返回小木蟲查看更多