請各位好心人幫幫傻孩子吧~編輯返回了評審的修改意見，但是有2條看不懂........請大家?guī)蛶臀�，幫我分析一下下面這2條是什么意思，好嗎~感謝感謝！
1. It is normally good to give the full name of the abbreviations/symbols when first used- despite them appearing in Abbreviations list. Also, in this part authors must present variables, binary variables, and parameters.
這一條我不太懂編輯說的 binary variables（直譯是二進制變量）是指什么，因為我去看了期刊命名表里沒有 binary variables這樣定的分類

2.Discussion. What is missing is a phase of discussion. Firstly, with regard to the results obtained. How do they relate to existing literature? Then, in terms of wider discussion with other articles, trying to better analyse the practical implications of these results. Don't forget that this hybrid approach is always a decision support tool.
請問這個修改意見是需要我加很大一章的Discussion嗎，還是加一小節(jié)就好呢，因為編輯最后的意見是讓我修改，那我在修改這一條的時候是不是不能用太多的篇幅呢？請有經(jīng)驗的各位幫我分析一下吧，多謝了~！ 返回小木蟲查看更多