論文審了一個半月，就只有一個審稿人，編輯給的意見是個小修。但是不太好處理這個問題，請各位前輩幫我參謀參謀！
Yes, all the conclusions are totally right, that is undisputed. But the logic of this is a little mumble disconnected, and cannot hang together. I think the focus of the logic is that from the design, they found different relationship between molybdenum equivalent and length and width of α would lead different properties. And the experiments with different length and width of α would verify this. So the method of the design should be successful.
審稿人覺得兩部分工作的邏輯聯(lián)系不是很緊密，其實也確實是這樣，但是由于篇幅太長了，這個文章里我們略過了這個比較，但是在另一篇正在撰寫的文章中進行了這個比較，
我該怎么處理這個情況比較好？ 返回小木蟲查看更多