碰上極端了，一個人說很好，有價值還幫我修改手稿。一個人說沒有啥創(chuàng)新，有些方法是錯誤的（審稿人誤解了）。主編給的態(tài)度是大修，還說reconsider your paper for publication。請問這個情況返修回去還要送給拒稿的審稿人嗎，或者是找新的審稿人嗎？

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. On the basis of their comments, I recommend major revision and that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider your paper for publication. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are appended below. Reviewer#1 suggests publication with minor changes. Reviewer#2 suggests rejection on the basis of the limited novelty of your work, but also provides useful suggestions to improve your work. Your manuscript should be shortened and the reference list should only contain those references that are strictly necessary. If you decide to revise your manuscript, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point raised by Reviewers. This information should be listed in the "Author Comments" section.

 返回小木蟲查看更多