1.2投的某3區(qū)sci,3.15 current status變?yōu)閞esive,view decision為resive,收到的郵件如下：

dear xx,

thank you for submitting your paper to xxxx. the article has been revised by an external reviewer and the editors. as you will see, they have found it of potential interest, but raised important criticisms which the editors share.  therefore, we will consider a  resubmission of your paper if you are interested in modifying its contents taking  into  account  the suggestions of the referees, which you will find appended below.

if you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes (or a rebuttal against each point raised) along with the revised manuscript. changes made in response to reviewer comments should be highlighted in the text of the manuscript.
...
...
...
please understand that we cannot assure publication of a revised paper, since the final editorial decision will be made after reevaluation by the referees. the new version should be sent to the editorial office by jun 13, 2021, otherwise it will be considered as a new submission.

reviewer #1:
..........關(guān)于研究?jī)?nèi)容的描述......
this results might be interesting and worthwhile for publication and coherent with the aims of the journal .
nevertheless the discussion is redundant and should be more fluent.
figures should be less crowed and, maybe, graphics might be useful
請(qǐng)各位蟲友幫忙看看審稿意見，是要再精簡(jiǎn)討論內(nèi)容的意思嗎？最后一句不是很懂，figures與graphics的區(qū)別是什么？這里figures是指什么？謝謝！ 返回小木蟲查看更多