大家部幫我看看這個審稿人的意見,是reject還是revise
in this work, the divalent cation adsorption on the periphery of the large pore in monolayer graphene oxide membranes acts on water desalination have been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. it reports that the presence of the divalent cation on the rim of the pore can not only reduce the amount of the salt ions located in the region around the pore but also prolong their permeation time across the pore, subsequently leading to the remarkable enhancement of the salt rejection rate. moreover, the role of graphene oxidation degree on water desalination is also elucidated. the water desalination performance of the pore with adsorbed divalent cation is more robust against oxidation degree variation. this result offers significant instructions to the excogitation of the new nanoporous graphene oxide membranes for high-performance water desalination. even if the results of the manuscript are potentially interesting, there are still some problems that are not stated clearly. for this reason, the publication of the manuscript in the present until the present points are addressed:
(1) how the mg 2+ ions fixed near the pore in the simulations? how to maintain the stability of mg 2+ ions in md simulations?
(2) how does salt ion distribution affect salt rejection rate? is there a quantitative relationship?
(3) authors reported that the pore exhibits an excellent desalination performance at some certain oxidation. can this optimized parameter be defined in md simulation?
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
修訂后接收,就是個大修或中修的審稿意見。
謝謝!
很常規(guī)的敘述,有一句肯定了你的工作,問題看起來也不刁鉆大概率修改后接受了
"even if the results of the manuscript are potentially interesting, there are still some problems that are not stated clearly. for this reason, the publication of the manuscript in the present until the present points are addressed:"
需要修改后才有被接收的可能
基于這份review report,應該是major revision
謝謝
,
從頭到尾哪里提到拒稿了??明顯是修改啊