一個(gè)棘手的審稿人問題求建議
昨天收到一個(gè)審稿人意見,其中有一條意見想了一天也沒想好如何回復(fù),請萬能的小木蟲給點(diǎn)建議,這個(gè)問題從哪幾方面回復(fù),如果無法正面回復(fù)會不會讓審稿人不滿意而拒稿。4. the solvent volume and mass of solid particles mentioned in the experimental procedure with the three investigated techniques seem to be different (250 ml and 5 g with uae vs 150 ml and 3 g with se and hre). the authors need to clarify this point and explain the reason behind this difference.
PS.修改投回去第4天接收了,感謝大家!
[ Last edited by ljq158 on 2021-7-4 at 15:45 ]
返回小木蟲查看更多
今日熱帖
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號
250ml對比5克,150ml對比3克,這個(gè)濃度不是一樣么,你難道不是設(shè)計(jì)的同樣濃度比較嗎,好基礎(chǔ)的問題
直接回復(fù)是同一濃度下就可以了,那你做的時(shí)候?yàn)樯兑悴煌哪,把你的原因(qū)懮暇涂梢粤?br />
,