在關(guān)于不銹鋼表面鈍化膜EIS表征方面遇到審稿人的問題，不知道我理解的有沒有問題，向大神們求助。Performing EIS measurement after 10 min or 40 min is not really relevant. We need to have stationarity of the system to characterize correctly the passive layer. Authors show that the potential still evolve during the EIS measurement and consequently the results they show is different from the first version but it is still not accurate.
-     Consequently, The EEC used is not suitable and the parameters obtained for EIS diagram interpretation need to be studied with more attention. The physical meaning of this parameters must be the guidelines for a good understanding of the interface behavior and reactivity.
   審稿人覺得我擬合的阻抗數(shù)據(jù)跟他的經(jīng)驗不符，數(shù)量級上差半個，覺得我的系統(tǒng)不夠穩(wěn)定造成的，我是用R(RQ)(RQ)模型擬合的結(jié)果，他覺得這個也有問題。
但是我做實驗的時候ocp確實已經(jīng)比較穩(wěn)定了，而且擬合結(jié)果也挺好的，所以我打算再做長時間的靜置，再測eis,再用R(Q(R(RQ)))擬合試試，確實對界面行為理解沒那么透徹，不知道我對他的意見領(lǐng)會的對不對，請各位指點啊，小弟金幣不足，下次再來感謝，求求各位大佬。

 返回小木蟲查看更多