JMCA被拒，理由是缺少性能比較，請(qǐng)大家給點(diǎn)意見(jiàn)
JMCA被編輯拒稿了，理由是沒(méi)有充分比較最新研究。請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔纯次疫@個(gè)可以修改后重新投嗎？先行謝過(guò)！
Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry A, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. All manuscripts are initially assessed by the editors to ensure they meet the criteria for publication in the journal.
After careful evaluation of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in Journal of Materials Chemistry A. Although you report organic semiconductor thermoset composite films using poly(3-hexylthiophene)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) (P3HT-b-PCL) block copolymer nanofibers produced via crystallization-driven self-assembly, unfortunately the performance is not clearly compared to similar state-of-the-art materials, meaning that it is not possible to judge what improvements have been made over current literature in the area. Therefore, your article has been rejected from Journal of Materials Chemistry A.
However, I am pleased to offer you the option to transfer your manuscript to the following journal(s) published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. Selecting one of these transfer options provides a quick and easy route for your manuscript to be considered by another journal without having to start a new submission. （RSC advances）
If you have any questions about transferring your manuscript to one of these journal(s), please contact me and I will pass your query to the relevant editorial office.
Full details of the initial assessment process can be found at https://www.rsc.org/journals-boo ... licies/#submissions
I am sorry not to have better news for you, however, thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. I look forward to hearing from you about the transfer of your manuscript from Journal of Materials Chemistry A to another Royal Society of Chemistry journal.
Yours sincerely,
Dr Michaela Mühlberg, MRSC
Executive Editor
Royal Society of Chemistry
If you need to contact the journal, please use the email address MaterialsA@rsc.org
原文中的確缺少性能比較，還是說(shuō)因?yàn)闆](méi)有引用JMCA的文章呢。如果增加這些內(nèi)容還有機(jī)會(huì)么？請(qǐng)大家給點(diǎn)意見(jiàn)
返回小木蟲(chóng)查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
做一個(gè)性能比較，再引用一下我覺(jué)得還是有機(jī)會(huì)的（前提是你的東西確實(shí)有亮點(diǎn)）
感覺(jué)如果自信文章的亮點(diǎn)，可以argue下，試試
這個(gè)是執(zhí)行編輯處理的，不是副編，執(zhí)行編輯和出版編輯處理稿件經(jīng)常因?yàn)闆](méi)有性能比較不送審，加個(gè)表格做個(gè)性能對(duì)比唄。如果覺(jué)得文章質(zhì)量不錯(cuò)，可以appeal。
，
可以試試！
大佬 你又重新投jmca了嗎 我也遇到了相同的問(wèn)題 執(zhí)行編輯說(shuō)沒(méi)有性能比較給我拒稿了
怎么樣了后來(lái)