對于這種審稿人意見請問大家有什么看法
Extensive papers are available in this field and hence a significance in novelty is required. (往常的該類型材料都是片狀的,我做成全新的網(wǎng)格狀了,我不理解為什么不算創(chuàng)新)
Of course, as the authors said, the exact procedure may be different but significance of the achievement is not convincing. (我把加了新成分的和未加的做了全面對比,結(jié)果全然不同,性能差異很大,我不理解為什么叫作用不彰顯了)
As far as the scope of this journal is concerned, this paper deals with new additive, agent during deposition and for surface finishing. . . no other technological information is provided.(電化學(xué)過程啊,停了實(shí)驗(yàn)連信息的影子都找不到,讓我去做原位么,我沒條件啊,還是說讓我做對本論文沒意義的xps,afm騙人)
The extent of achievement in terms of results are not convincingly presented to understand in the present scenario. The basic support is also week (old references have formed the basis) and no comparison has been made in the updated current status. (對比工作從頭到尾都有,不知道這個(gè)審稿人怎么看的?文獻(xiàn)有少部分是60年代,那是因?yàn)樘砑游锏幕A(chǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)很少有人做了,難道我不引,重新做一遍?我都寫35頁了,還叫weak啊,這審稿人從頭到尾用week,英語都不過關(guān),到底是誰的專業(yè)素養(yǎng)有問題呢)
The discussion is generally week and mostly focuses on Corrosion resistance (with little data). . .(討論都進(jìn)行到結(jié)構(gòu)了,還叫“week”?而且腐蝕性能根本不是此文討論的重點(diǎn),是附帶的。
and most of the content deals with optimization of deposition parameters including concentration w.r.t. improvement in surface properties in terms of corrosion resistance. The paper may be considered for its submission to a more specialized journal such as CORROSION science.
最不理解的是,編輯居然同意了他的看法,我有必要appeal嗎,還是直接換一家算了,想聽聽大家意見。
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
直接轉(zhuǎn)吧,沒意思
審稿人的意見很具體,除非你能提供更多的數(shù)據(jù),否則編輯應(yīng)該不會(huì)接收你的appeal,轉(zhuǎn)投吧
,