編輯返回信息,求教二個(gè)問(wèn)題
30-aug-2021
dear dr. dong,
manuscript number: xxxx
thank you for submitting your manuscript "XXXX" to science. because your manuscript was not given a high priority rating during the initial screening process, we have decided not to proceed to in-depth review. the overall view is that the scope and focus of your paper make it more appropriate for a more specialized journal. we are therefore notifying you so that you can seek publication elsewhere.
sincerely,
brent grocholski, ph.d.
science
一、開(kāi)頭稱呼用dr.,下次投稿學(xué)歷可以填dr.嗎,因?yàn)閷?shí)際學(xué)歷比這個(gè)低,填了會(huì)是學(xué)術(shù)不端嗎,或者就是一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的稱呼嗎?
二、 overall view說(shuō)明多人看過(guò)論文,論文還算靠譜,只是因?yàn)榉秶M窄而應(yīng)該投更專(zhuān)業(yè)的期刊對(duì)嗎?
[ last edited by dosupy on 2021-8-31 at 09:18 ]
[ Last edited by dosupy on 2021-9-7 at 00:02 ]
返回小木蟲(chóng)查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
看了,l 你的論文是否是你寫(xiě)過(guò)的最好的論文?
l 它是否會(huì)對(duì)你所從事的研究領(lǐng)域產(chǎn)生重大影響?
l 相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的科學(xué)家會(huì)對(duì)其結(jié)果感興趣嗎?
l 讀者會(huì)對(duì)其結(jié)論吃驚嗎?
l 它推翻了傳統(tǒng)理論嗎?
如果你對(duì)上述問(wèn)題的回答是肯定的,那么你的論文就可能適合向《science》投稿
這幾條全中,刪了一半公式,有的實(shí)在無(wú)法刪掉
,
好
加油
??
加油
加油