版塊導(dǎo)航: 正在加載中...

登錄注冊

應(yīng)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未進(jìn)行實(shí)名認(rèn)證將不得使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)跟帖服務(wù)。為保障您的帳號能夠正常使用，請盡快對帳號進(jìn)行手機(jī)號驗(yàn)證，感謝您的理解與支持！

24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜

返回列表

破軍愛科研

木蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 5400.7
散金: 222
紅花: 1
帖子: 66
在線: 34.2小時(shí)
蟲號: 2257597
注冊: 2013-01-23
性別: GG
專業(yè): 無機(jī)化工

kg-mol，g-mol（國內(nèi)常見）和lb-mol都是摩爾的單位，前面的質(zhì)量單位只是表示這個(gè)摩爾數(shù)計(jì)算的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并不是真的表示分母一個(gè)kg，要不也應(yīng)該是J/kg/mol或者J/kg·mol，是吧？

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

11樓2013-04-27 11:51:23

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

破軍愛科研

木蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 5400.7
散金: 222
紅花: 1
帖子: 66
在線: 34.2小時(shí)
蟲號: 2257597
注冊: 2013-01-23
性別: GG
專業(yè): 無機(jī)化工

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

12樓2013-04-27 11:51:56

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

padian

木蟲 (著名寫手)

應(yīng)助: 51 (初中生)
金幣: 2399.2
散金: 841
紅花: 7
帖子: 1141
在線: 229.3小時(shí)
蟲號: 500995
注冊: 2008-02-13
專業(yè): 凝聚態(tài)物性 II ：電子結(jié)構(gòu)

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

★ ★
安藍(lán)2728: 金幣+1, ★★★很有幫助 2013-05-15 11:14:07
sddtc888: 金幣+1, 謝謝參與，歡迎常來！ 2013-05-15 20:57:05

說下我個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)

個(gè)人感覺好像kg-mol就表示千mol，也就是這個(gè)化學(xué)反應(yīng)每發(fā)生1000 mol的焓變是多少kJ。

你可以算算看，對不對。

希望有幫助

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

13樓2013-04-29 10:49:56

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

安藍(lán)2728

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 121.7
散金: 2
帖子: 218
在線: 133.6小時(shí)
蟲號: 665261
注冊: 2008-11-30
專業(yè): 鋼鐵冶金

引用回帖:

10樓: Originally posted by 破軍愛科研 at 2013-04-27 11:48:20
焓的單位不能帶一個(gè)mol還帶一個(gè)kg，可能的情況也就是kg標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的摩爾，區(qū)別于lb-mol和g-mol.你把kg-mol換算成g-mol試試，不行的話，就不知道為什么了

“Chemical engineers use the concept extensively, but the unit is rather small for industrial use.[15] For convenience in avoiding conversions, some American engineers adopted the pound-mole (noted lb-mol or lbmol), which is defined as the number of entities in 12 lb of 12C. One lb-mol is equal to 453.59237 mol.[16] In the metric system, chemical engineers once used the kilogram-mole (noted kg-mol), which is defined as the number of entities in 12 kg of 12C, and often referred to the mole as the gram-mole (noted g-mol), when dealing with laboratory data.[16] However modern chemical engineering practice is to use the kilomole (kmol), which is identical to the kilogram-mole, but whose name and symbol adopt the SI convention for standard multiples of metric units.”
這是我在維基百科里面找到的一段話，按照他這個(gè)理解的話Kg-mole（千克摩爾）似乎就是kmole（千摩爾），但是文獻(xiàn)里基本沒有這樣轉(zhuǎn)化的，這樣轉(zhuǎn)化出來都是錯(cuò)的！lb-mol （磅-摩爾）的轉(zhuǎn)化是對的，1lb-mol =435.6mole

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

14樓2013-05-15 11:13:10

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

安藍(lán)2728

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 121.7
散金: 2
帖子: 218
在線: 133.6小時(shí)
蟲號: 665261
注冊: 2008-11-30
專業(yè): 鋼鐵冶金

引用回帖:

13樓: Originally posted by padian at 2013-04-29 10:49:56
說下我個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)

個(gè)人感覺好像kg-mol就表示千mol，也就是這個(gè)化學(xué)反應(yīng)每發(fā)生1000 mol的焓變是多少kJ。

你可以算算看，對不對。

希望有幫助

這樣的轉(zhuǎn)換在我看到的文獻(xiàn)里不對，但是我在維基百科查到的是這樣轉(zhuǎn)換的！

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

15樓2013-05-15 11:15:05

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

安藍(lán)2728

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 121.7
散金: 2
帖子: 218
在線: 133.6小時(shí)
蟲號: 665261
注冊: 2008-11-30
專業(yè): 鋼鐵冶金

Apparently someone saw fit to undo the changes I made a few days ago to add a section to this article about other definitions of a mole (e.g., a kg-mol). He/she claimed that these changes were inappropriate as "These are not definitions of the mole." I must disagree: I have had numerous students confused by the use of kg-mol and lb-mol in textbooks, primarily because they too thought there was only one way to define a mole. Confusingly or otherwise, these definitions persist.

The term kg-mol is quite common among chemical engineers, and the lb-mol is even more common among chemical engineers from the USA. Software designed to assist in chemical plant design, such as PRO/II and ASPEN, all include these units. While these alternate definitions are rarely if ever seen outside the field of chemical engineering, their existence warrants at least being mentioned in an article dedicated to the definition of a mole.

Examples:

M. S. Peters, K. Timmerhaus, and R. E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, Fifth Edition. McGraw Hill (2002-2003). [Uses kg-mol, written as such.]
J. M. Douglas, Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. Boston: McGraw Hill (1988). [Uses lb-mol, written as mol, throughout.]
Kaiserkarl13 (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

The pound-mole (also written without the hyphen) is a separate unit, although the link currently redirects here. The "kilogram-mole" is just an obsolescent name for the kilomole. Both of them are units of measurement of amount of substance that can be found in some US texts, but neither of them is the same unit as the mole. The confusion only arises if you pretend that they are. Physchim62 (talk) 22:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
The fact that pound-moles and kilogram-moles are separate units but are still called moles was my point! The fact that kilomoles and kilogram-moles are the same is a result of the fact that kilo(grams) and (kilograms) are the same, but the kg-mol is in no way an obsolete unit---it just happens to have the same meaning as a kmol and takes more characters to type. The purpose of the added text is to point out that there is more than one definition of a mole---with the standard SI unit of a mole being defined in terms of the gram. There's nothing pretend about it, though---the units kg-mol and lb-mol still occur, and they are no less valid as definitions of a mole. They just aren't the ones associated with the SI definition of "the mole." Kaiserkarl13 (talk) 23:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You'd never say that pounds are another way of defining grams, so why do you say that the pound-mole is another way of defining the mole? It's another way of defining a unit of amount of substance, yes, but there is no law that says that all units of amount of substance have to be called "moles": in fact, there is a good pedagogical case for pointing out the exact opposite! Physchim62 (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not contending that the specific unit referred to as the mole (i.e., the SI unit defined as the number of entities in 12 g of 12-C) is the same unit as a kilogram-mole---obviously it isn't. The point of contention is that other units of amount of substance are invariably also called moles (with some modifier), perhaps merely due to lack of creativity. An excellent example is the unfortunate use of pounds in the English Imperial System to refer to both units of force and mass (these are, of course, different but related units). I think this point of contention could be settled by adding a section titled something like, "Units related to the mole" in which other units of amount of substance are defined. This would have the advantage of clarifying that "the mole" (unit) and "a mole" (generic term for amount of substance, usually but not always referring to the SI unit) can be different things. This would also solve the problem of pound-mole and kilogram-mole currently redirecting to Mole_(unit), which doesn't mention either of these other units. I may write these articles at a later date when I have the time. Kaiserkarl13 (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Possibly this should be "Other units called mole" or something on those lines? That would make it clear that the lb-mole and kg-mole (both of which redirect here) are not actually the mole but rather something else with a confusingly similar name… I think I'll go add that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabik (talk • contribs) 16:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I have re-written the section, trying to be brief and non-contentious, while giving a source and giving the style of an encylopedia. I hope this helps. Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

把關(guān)于這個(gè)單位的討論也貼上來，他們自己對這個(gè)單位似乎也很混亂！

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

16樓2013-05-15 11:17:54

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

安藍(lán)2728

新蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 121.7
散金: 2
帖子: 218
在線: 133.6小時(shí)
蟲號: 665261
注冊: 2008-11-30
專業(yè): 鋼鐵冶金

引用回帖:

11樓: Originally posted by 破軍愛科研 at 2013-04-27 11:51:23
kg-mol，g-mol（國內(nèi)常見）和lb-mol都是摩爾的單位，前面的質(zhì)量單位只是表示這個(gè)摩爾數(shù)計(jì)算的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并不是真的表示分母一個(gè)kg，要不也應(yīng)該是J/kg/mol或者J/kg·mol，是吧？

它們應(yīng)該都是摩爾的單位

贊一下

回復(fù)此樓

17樓2013-05-15 11:36:58

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn) 我要訂閱樓主安藍(lán)2728 的主題更新

返回列表

最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部]		作者	回/看	最后發(fā)表

[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語六級551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +5	生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17	9/450	2026-03-21 23:32 by zhujy1982
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +13	冬十三 2026-03-15	14/700	2026-03-21 22:10 by peike
[考研] 【考研調(diào)劑】化學(xué)專業(yè) 281分，一志愿四川大學(xué)，誠心求調(diào)劑 +11	吃吃吃才有意義 2026-03-19	11/550	2026-03-21 18:23 by 學(xué)員8dgXkO
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +9	煙火先于春 2026-03-17	9/450	2026-03-21 17:47 by 學(xué)員8dgXkO
[考研] 279分求調(diào)劑一志愿211 +14	chaojifeixia 2026-03-19	15/750	2026-03-21 13:24 by zhukairuo
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué)071000，求調(diào)劑 +3	沿岸有貝殼6 2026-03-21	3/150	2026-03-21 10:35 by 暮云清寒
[考研] 機(jī)械專碩299求調(diào)劑至材料 +3	kkcoco25 2026-03-16	4/200	2026-03-21 03:52 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3	wyyyqx 2026-03-17	3/150	2026-03-21 03:20 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 材料工程（專）一志愿985 初試335求調(diào)劑 +3	hiloiy 2026-03-17	4/200	2026-03-21 03:04 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 材料 336 求調(diào)劑 +3	An@. 2026-03-18	4/200	2026-03-21 01:39 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7	司空. 2026-03-18	7/350	2026-03-20 23:08 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +9	Doleres 2026-03-19	9/450	2026-03-20 22:36 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9	想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19	9/450	2026-03-20 22:01 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3	@taotao 2026-03-19	3/150	2026-03-20 21:34 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +3	￣^￣゜汗 2026-03-19	4/200	2026-03-20 21:01 by zhukairuo
[考研] 招收調(diào)劑碩士 +4	lidianxing 2026-03-19	12/600	2026-03-20 12:25 by lidianxing
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3	暗涌afhb 2026-03-16	3/150	2026-03-20 00:28 by 河南大學(xué)校友
[考研] 【同濟(jì)軟件】軟件（085405）考研求調(diào)劑 +3	2026eternal 2026-03-18	3/150	2026-03-18 19:09 by 搏擊518
[論文投稿] 有沒有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個(gè)二作 +3	增銳漏人 2026-03-17	4/200	2026-03-17 09:26 by xs74101122
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6	拾光任染 2026-03-15	11/550	2026-03-15 22:47 by 拾光任染