 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5708 | 回復(fù): 25 | ||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
TIE審稿意見求分析 已有5人參與
|
||
|
新人所有金幣都散出去 兩個月前重新投的IEEE TIE，昨天給的大修結(jié)果，感覺評審意見挺狠的，這樣能讓大修已經(jīng)不錯了。 現(xiàn)在難點是我文章已經(jīng)八頁了（TIE規(guī)定頁書），他們給了很多條評審意見，我要都加進去肯定超篇幅了，請前輩們指教怎么辦，再投的話中的概率大嗎？以下是審稿意見 Keio University, Yokohama, Japan, 04-Aug-2016 Dear Authors, The review process of your manuscript No. 16-TIE-1627 entitled "Implant Position of Receiving Coils of the Wireless Charging System for the Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker" as a Regular paper submission, has been completed. Based on the opinions of the reviewers and the Associate Editor in charge, your manuscript requires a major revision. - Please revise your manuscript within 6 weeks to address the enclosed reviewers' comments, and highlight the changes in the manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be evaluated again. - Please understand that the manuscript is still considered to be in the review process, so it is important that authors' names and affiliations must NOT be identifiable in any documents uploaded to Manuscript Central. Otherwise the paper will be automatically rejected. Please note that if your revised manuscript exceeds the page limit of TIE (3 pages for "Letter to Editor" and 8 pages for regular and "Special Section" papers), extra page cost will be billed to you, according to the rate posted by IEEE. The manuscript length couldn't exceed 10 pages (5 pages for letters). Your kind cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, Prof. Kouhei Ohnishi Editor-in-Chief IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics https://www.ieee-ies.org/pubs/tr ... strial-electronics/ ohnishi@sd.keio.ac.jp ************************************************************** Encl.: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author Thanks for the authors' efforts on the revision. Please highlight the modifications in the paper to facilitate the review next time. The reviewer still has some concerns about this paper. 1. In the proposed model, the transmitting coils and the receiving coils are aligned. However, this cannot be guaranteed in a real case. The authors are suggested to investigate the case if the coils are misaligned, and how it will affect the accuracy of the proposed model. 2. Eq. (25) is not design friendly. It is better to give a simplified equation as a design guideline for engineers. 3. The reviewer is also confused by that why need to use curve fitting (Eq.26). Should't the measurement results be used to verify Eq. 25? Otherwise, what's the contribution of this paper? 4. In the experiment, the effect of human tissue is not considered. Please comment on that. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The modification has improved the quality of the manuscript. However, some issues still exist in the manuscript. Therefore, some mandatory changes should be carried out before accepting. Some of these changes are the following: 1. Since the receiving coils are also implanted, the loss on it will generate some heat, how would the authors address this issue? 2. Since the receiving coils are connected with the charging circuits of pacemaker, it will significantly increase the overall size of the pacemaker. Would the authors comment on this problem? 3. Since the authors use air core transmitter and receiving coils, the magnetic field is not constrained at all. It would be helpful for the authors to perform some analysis on the magnetic field strength and its impact to human body. 4. The errors shown in Table I are relatively large, is it possible to further reduce the mismatch? 5. For lithium-ion battery charging, there are usually two charging stages, constant current and constant voltage. Therefore, battery voltage reaches 4.2V doesn’t necessary mean the battery is full. It would be better to show the charging power and efficiency instead of pure battery voltage. 6. There are some typing errors need to be fixed. For example, on page 5 Fig. 3, it should be “FPC” coil instead of “PFC” coil. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author In page 2 left column line 42, authors said “Although no study has investigated the effect of eddy current in the inductor on the induced voltage across receiving coils of WPT system currently, this question is critical for the realization and application of WPT.” However, it was already discussed in the following paper [1]. [1] T. Campi, S. Cruciani, V. D. Santis, and M. Feliziani, “EMF Safety and Thermal Aspects in a Pacemaker Equipped With a Wireless Power Transfer System Working at Low Frequency,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 64, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2016 pp. 375-382 The authors should refer this paper and state difference from the paper. Reviewer: 4 Comments to the Author This paper studied the WPT design for implantable cardiac pacemaker applications with the impact of the pacemaker shell considered. Both physical modeling and experimental demonstration are presented. 1. The new title of this paper is also not very suitable for the content of this work. One important contribution of this paper would be the physical modeling part, which is not reflected in the title. 2. This paper considered the pacemaker shell which is present in the real case. However, the other constraints of the real applications are not mentioned. References and/or analyses should be provided on the inter-coil distance, primary-pacemaker shell distance, volume allowable for the implanted secondary coil in vivo, the effect of human tissues, allowable heat generation, etc. 3. In the introduction part, the authors defined the transformer type as coils wound around ferrite core. This is not a correct statement as there are many coreless transformers reported. 4. The authors only reported the induced voltage in the experiment part. How about the efficiency and the heat generation at the secondary side? If the performance is not good, a suggestion for this paper is to focus more on the modeling contribution. 5. The inductance unit should be "uH" instead of "uF". 6. The writing and English of this paper could also be further improved. AE Comments: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: Considering the reviewers' comments, this paper still needs major revisions before considering it for publication. Please, address carefully all the reviewers' comments and try to avoid an over-length manuscript. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿太原理工安全工程300分，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
調(diào)劑求院校招收
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
085600，材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
一志愿武漢理工，總分321，英一數(shù)二，求老師收留。
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
考研調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
0856求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
317求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
godtornado
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 1549 (講師)
- 金幣: 12182.5
- 紅花: 51
- 沙發(fā): 2
- 帖子: 9472
- 在線: 612小時
- 蟲號: 4764786
- 注冊: 2016-06-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 外國語言
15樓2016-08-06 09:33:03
2樓2016-08-05 17:25:06
3樓2016-08-05 20:42:07
4樓2016-08-05 20:46:28
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324 +7 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可 +9 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086000調(diào)劑 +3 | 7901117076 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小張zxy張 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工085600，總分304，本科有兩篇sci參與，求調(diào)劑 +10 | 幸運的醬醬 2026-03-22 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +10 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 安徽大學(xué)專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分，英語已過四六級，六級521，求調(diào)劑 +4 | 美味可樂雞翅 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +3 | 雨清天晴 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)338求調(diào)劑！ +6 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 325求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李嘉圖·S·路 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求收留 +7 | 果然有我 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學(xué)/生化與分子/生物信息學(xué)相關(guān)調(diào)劑 +5 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +6 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 +3 | wcq131415 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 請教下大家 2026年國家基金申請是雙盲審嗎？ +3 | lishucheng1 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學(xué)碩288求調(diào)劑 +8 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 336化工調(diào)劑 +4 | 王大坦1 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|