 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5723 | 回復(fù): 25 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
TIE審稿意見求分析 已有5人參與
|
||
|
新人所有金幣都散出去 兩個(gè)月前重新投的IEEE TIE，昨天給的大修結(jié)果，感覺評(píng)審意見挺狠的，這樣能讓大修已經(jīng)不錯(cuò)了。 現(xiàn)在難點(diǎn)是我文章已經(jīng)八頁了（TIE規(guī)定頁書），他們給了很多條評(píng)審意見，我要都加進(jìn)去肯定超篇幅了，請(qǐng)前輩們指教怎么辦，再投的話中的概率大嗎？以下是審稿意見 Keio University, Yokohama, Japan, 04-Aug-2016 Dear Authors, The review process of your manuscript No. 16-TIE-1627 entitled "Implant Position of Receiving Coils of the Wireless Charging System for the Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker" as a Regular paper submission, has been completed. Based on the opinions of the reviewers and the Associate Editor in charge, your manuscript requires a major revision. - Please revise your manuscript within 6 weeks to address the enclosed reviewers' comments, and highlight the changes in the manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be evaluated again. - Please understand that the manuscript is still considered to be in the review process, so it is important that authors' names and affiliations must NOT be identifiable in any documents uploaded to Manuscript Central. Otherwise the paper will be automatically rejected. Please note that if your revised manuscript exceeds the page limit of TIE (3 pages for "Letter to Editor" and 8 pages for regular and "Special Section" papers), extra page cost will be billed to you, according to the rate posted by IEEE. The manuscript length couldn't exceed 10 pages (5 pages for letters). Your kind cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, Prof. Kouhei Ohnishi Editor-in-Chief IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics https://www.ieee-ies.org/pubs/tr ... strial-electronics/ ohnishi@sd.keio.ac.jp ************************************************************** Encl.: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author Thanks for the authors' efforts on the revision. Please highlight the modifications in the paper to facilitate the review next time. The reviewer still has some concerns about this paper. 1. In the proposed model, the transmitting coils and the receiving coils are aligned. However, this cannot be guaranteed in a real case. The authors are suggested to investigate the case if the coils are misaligned, and how it will affect the accuracy of the proposed model. 2. Eq. (25) is not design friendly. It is better to give a simplified equation as a design guideline for engineers. 3. The reviewer is also confused by that why need to use curve fitting (Eq.26). Should't the measurement results be used to verify Eq. 25? Otherwise, what's the contribution of this paper? 4. In the experiment, the effect of human tissue is not considered. Please comment on that. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The modification has improved the quality of the manuscript. However, some issues still exist in the manuscript. Therefore, some mandatory changes should be carried out before accepting. Some of these changes are the following: 1. Since the receiving coils are also implanted, the loss on it will generate some heat, how would the authors address this issue? 2. Since the receiving coils are connected with the charging circuits of pacemaker, it will significantly increase the overall size of the pacemaker. Would the authors comment on this problem? 3. Since the authors use air core transmitter and receiving coils, the magnetic field is not constrained at all. It would be helpful for the authors to perform some analysis on the magnetic field strength and its impact to human body. 4. The errors shown in Table I are relatively large, is it possible to further reduce the mismatch? 5. For lithium-ion battery charging, there are usually two charging stages, constant current and constant voltage. Therefore, battery voltage reaches 4.2V doesn’t necessary mean the battery is full. It would be better to show the charging power and efficiency instead of pure battery voltage. 6. There are some typing errors need to be fixed. For example, on page 5 Fig. 3, it should be “FPC” coil instead of “PFC” coil. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author In page 2 left column line 42, authors said “Although no study has investigated the effect of eddy current in the inductor on the induced voltage across receiving coils of WPT system currently, this question is critical for the realization and application of WPT.” However, it was already discussed in the following paper [1]. [1] T. Campi, S. Cruciani, V. D. Santis, and M. Feliziani, “EMF Safety and Thermal Aspects in a Pacemaker Equipped With a Wireless Power Transfer System Working at Low Frequency,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 64, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2016 pp. 375-382 The authors should refer this paper and state difference from the paper. Reviewer: 4 Comments to the Author This paper studied the WPT design for implantable cardiac pacemaker applications with the impact of the pacemaker shell considered. Both physical modeling and experimental demonstration are presented. 1. The new title of this paper is also not very suitable for the content of this work. One important contribution of this paper would be the physical modeling part, which is not reflected in the title. 2. This paper considered the pacemaker shell which is present in the real case. However, the other constraints of the real applications are not mentioned. References and/or analyses should be provided on the inter-coil distance, primary-pacemaker shell distance, volume allowable for the implanted secondary coil in vivo, the effect of human tissues, allowable heat generation, etc. 3. In the introduction part, the authors defined the transformer type as coils wound around ferrite core. This is not a correct statement as there are many coreless transformers reported. 4. The authors only reported the induced voltage in the experiment part. How about the efficiency and the heat generation at the secondary side? If the performance is not good, a suggestion for this paper is to focus more on the modeling contribution. 5. The inductance unit should be "uH" instead of "uF". 6. The writing and English of this paper could also be further improved. AE Comments: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: Considering the reviewers' comments, this paper still needs major revisions before considering it for publication. Please, address carefully all the reviewers' comments and try to avoid an over-length manuscript. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿山東大學(xué)，085600，344
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
22408調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
化工調(diào)劑303分，過四級(jí)
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
260求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
266分，一志愿電氣工程，本科材料，求材料專業(yè)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
349求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
學(xué)碩機(jī)械工程303求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
312求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
3樓2016-08-05 20:42:07
2樓2016-08-05 17:25:06
4樓2016-08-05 20:46:28
Chaoyunsong
銀蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 3 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 371.2
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 33
- 在線: 95.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 2742971
- 注冊(cè): 2013-10-22
- 專業(yè): 電磁場與波
5樓2016-08-05 20:57:02
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +5 | zyx上岸！ 2026-04-02 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑，一志愿鄭州大學(xué)材料與化工專碩，英二數(shù)二342分，求老師收留 +5 | v12abo 2026-04-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +6 | 一樣YWY 2026-04-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +13 | jjjjjjjjjjl 2026-03-27 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292分，材料與化工，申請(qǐng)調(diào)劑 +19 | 程晴之 2026-04-01 | 23/1150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 270調(diào)劑 +7 | maxjxbsk 2026-04-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +8 | DLkz1314. 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑0703 +5 | 周嘉堯 2026-03-31 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300一志愿211，312分求調(diào)劑院校 +14 | 小黃鴨寶 2026-03-30 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑，一志愿北林食品與營養(yǎng)095500，301分，已過六級(jí)，有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 快樂儲(chǔ)蓄罐 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑：一志愿：南京大學(xué) 專業(yè)：0705 總分320 ，本科985，四六級(jí)已過 +3 | lfy760306 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 080200學(xué)碩，機(jī)械工程專業(yè)277分，求帶走！ +4 | 瓶子PZ 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科211安全工程，初試290分，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2719846834 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +4 | 崔wj 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑 +11 | 麻辣魷魚 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 071010 323 分求調(diào)劑 +3 | Baekzhy 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 爭取九點(diǎn)睡 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|