 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5710 | 回復(fù): 25 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
TIE審稿意見求分析 已有5人參與
|
|||
|
新人所有金幣都散出去 兩個(gè)月前重新投的IEEE TIE，昨天給的大修結(jié)果，感覺(jué)評(píng)審意見挺狠的，這樣能讓大修已經(jīng)不錯(cuò)了。 現(xiàn)在難點(diǎn)是我文章已經(jīng)八頁(yè)了（TIE規(guī)定頁(yè)書），他們給了很多條評(píng)審意見，我要都加進(jìn)去肯定超篇幅了，請(qǐng)前輩們指教怎么辦，再投的話中的概率大嗎？以下是審稿意見 Keio University, Yokohama, Japan, 04-Aug-2016 Dear Authors, The review process of your manuscript No. 16-TIE-1627 entitled "Implant Position of Receiving Coils of the Wireless Charging System for the Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker" as a Regular paper submission, has been completed. Based on the opinions of the reviewers and the Associate Editor in charge, your manuscript requires a major revision. - Please revise your manuscript within 6 weeks to address the enclosed reviewers' comments, and highlight the changes in the manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be evaluated again. - Please understand that the manuscript is still considered to be in the review process, so it is important that authors' names and affiliations must NOT be identifiable in any documents uploaded to Manuscript Central. Otherwise the paper will be automatically rejected. Please note that if your revised manuscript exceeds the page limit of TIE (3 pages for "Letter to Editor" and 8 pages for regular and "Special Section" papers), extra page cost will be billed to you, according to the rate posted by IEEE. The manuscript length couldn't exceed 10 pages (5 pages for letters). Your kind cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, Prof. Kouhei Ohnishi Editor-in-Chief IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics https://www.ieee-ies.org/pubs/tr ... strial-electronics/ ohnishi@sd.keio.ac.jp ************************************************************** Encl.: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author Thanks for the authors' efforts on the revision. Please highlight the modifications in the paper to facilitate the review next time. The reviewer still has some concerns about this paper. 1. In the proposed model, the transmitting coils and the receiving coils are aligned. However, this cannot be guaranteed in a real case. The authors are suggested to investigate the case if the coils are misaligned, and how it will affect the accuracy of the proposed model. 2. Eq. (25) is not design friendly. It is better to give a simplified equation as a design guideline for engineers. 3. The reviewer is also confused by that why need to use curve fitting (Eq.26). Should't the measurement results be used to verify Eq. 25? Otherwise, what's the contribution of this paper? 4. In the experiment, the effect of human tissue is not considered. Please comment on that. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The modification has improved the quality of the manuscript. However, some issues still exist in the manuscript. Therefore, some mandatory changes should be carried out before accepting. Some of these changes are the following: 1. Since the receiving coils are also implanted, the loss on it will generate some heat, how would the authors address this issue? 2. Since the receiving coils are connected with the charging circuits of pacemaker, it will significantly increase the overall size of the pacemaker. Would the authors comment on this problem? 3. Since the authors use air core transmitter and receiving coils, the magnetic field is not constrained at all. It would be helpful for the authors to perform some analysis on the magnetic field strength and its impact to human body. 4. The errors shown in Table I are relatively large, is it possible to further reduce the mismatch? 5. For lithium-ion battery charging, there are usually two charging stages, constant current and constant voltage. Therefore, battery voltage reaches 4.2V doesn’t necessary mean the battery is full. It would be better to show the charging power and efficiency instead of pure battery voltage. 6. There are some typing errors need to be fixed. For example, on page 5 Fig. 3, it should be “FPC” coil instead of “PFC” coil. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author In page 2 left column line 42, authors said “Although no study has investigated the effect of eddy current in the inductor on the induced voltage across receiving coils of WPT system currently, this question is critical for the realization and application of WPT.” However, it was already discussed in the following paper [1]. [1] T. Campi, S. Cruciani, V. D. Santis, and M. Feliziani, “EMF Safety and Thermal Aspects in a Pacemaker Equipped With a Wireless Power Transfer System Working at Low Frequency,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 64, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2016 pp. 375-382 The authors should refer this paper and state difference from the paper. Reviewer: 4 Comments to the Author This paper studied the WPT design for implantable cardiac pacemaker applications with the impact of the pacemaker shell considered. Both physical modeling and experimental demonstration are presented. 1. The new title of this paper is also not very suitable for the content of this work. One important contribution of this paper would be the physical modeling part, which is not reflected in the title. 2. This paper considered the pacemaker shell which is present in the real case. However, the other constraints of the real applications are not mentioned. References and/or analyses should be provided on the inter-coil distance, primary-pacemaker shell distance, volume allowable for the implanted secondary coil in vivo, the effect of human tissues, allowable heat generation, etc. 3. In the introduction part, the authors defined the transformer type as coils wound around ferrite core. This is not a correct statement as there are many coreless transformers reported. 4. The authors only reported the induced voltage in the experiment part. How about the efficiency and the heat generation at the secondary side? If the performance is not good, a suggestion for this paper is to focus more on the modeling contribution. 5. The inductance unit should be "uH" instead of "uF". 6. The writing and English of this paper could also be further improved. AE Comments: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: Considering the reviewers' comments, this paper still needs major revisions before considering it for publication. Please, address carefully all the reviewers' comments and try to avoid an over-length manuscript. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
085701求調(diào)劑初試286分
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料工程294求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
本科新能源科學(xué)與工程，一志愿華理能動(dòng)285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
070305高分子化學(xué)與物理 304分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工（085600）296求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑一志愿海大，0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分，有大創(chuàng)項(xiàng)目，四級(jí)已過(guò)
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
071000生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑，初試成績(jī)343
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑，求導(dǎo)師收
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
|
謝謝 上木蟲真的很有收獲 還有一個(gè)問(wèn)題：如果兩個(gè)審稿人意見不統(tǒng)一怎么辦呢？我論文題目之前第一個(gè)審稿人說(shuō)不合適，然后重投的時(shí)候才改了�，F(xiàn)在最后一個(gè)審稿人又說(shuō)不合適。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
16樓2016-08-06 12:41:09
2樓2016-08-05 17:25:06
3樓2016-08-05 20:42:07
4樓2016-08-05 20:46:28
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學(xué)與工程，一志愿華理能動(dòng)285求調(diào)劑 +6 | AZMK 2026-03-28 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070305高分子化學(xué)與物理 304分求調(diào)劑 +5 | c297914 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +3 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 數(shù)一英一271專碩（085401）求調(diào)劑，可跨 +4 | 前行必有光 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑 +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +5 | 江辭666 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +3 | 加油a李zs 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研]
材料調(diào)劑
 5+4
|
想要一壺桃花水 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué) 296 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩總分317求調(diào)劑�。。�！ +4 | Acaciad 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物技術(shù)與工程 +3 | 1294608413 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854AI CV方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086003食品工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 淼淼111 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 材料考研調(diào)劑生
+3
|
黃粱一夢(mèng)千年 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯?xiàng)l 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|