| 查看: 2457 | 回復(fù): 15 | ||||
linsoklove金蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
各位幫我分析理解一下審稿意見(jiàn),讓我知道該怎么回答 已有4人參與
|
|
今天終于收到了審稿意見(jiàn),但是由于英文不太好,也由于太過(guò)于緊張了吧,現(xiàn)在一臉茫然。還希望各位幫我分析一下該如何回答。審稿意見(jiàn)如下: Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 - Strengths: The problem shown in the manuscript is interesting and well defined. The solving method may be interesting for other researchers. The application of results may lead to increase heat transfer capabilities which is within the scope of the Journal. The CFD simulation is compared with some experimental results. Most of the model parameters are explained. Weaknesses: The main interest for readers would be the simulation method which is described, but some more details could be given such as mesh details (the picture is informative, but number of cells, cell and shape in all regions could be given explicitly). The comparison with the experiment is shown only for offset angle, is it possible to address also at least qualitatively the thickness of the layer? Maybe for one case only but some remarks could be important for other researchers. The minimal flow for sur wetting could be simulated using this method? There is a small mistyped number in Fig 3b experiment shall be 200 instead of 100. -Reviewer 2 - Dear Author, This is well-written article that does identify an important gap in xxxx. There has been a few researches on xxxx reported in open literature. However, the article would be significantly improved with the addition of more review of the xxxx. This is because the review of the literature is not thorough for study of xxxx; because the author only referred to two articles which were published in 2014 and 2007, which has a big gap almost 10 years. The author did not critically review xxxx in the Introduction. This helps to show that this parameter is important to characterize xxxx. The details of my comments and suggestions are attached with this reviewer comments. |
金蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (著名寫手)
榮譽(yù)版主 (文壇精英)

榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒(méi)想好
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 |
| 第一個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)比較專業(yè)和具體,第二個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)相對(duì)籠統(tǒng),主要針對(duì)引言,要求增加引用的文章數(shù)量。建議樓主貼出不懂的部分,以便進(jìn)行有針對(duì)性的回答。 |

金蟲 (正式寫手)
| 看意見(jiàn),只要是能把審稿人1給說(shuō)服了,問(wèn)題就不大,多和導(dǎo)師商量一下怎么從專業(yè)的角度回應(yīng)審稿人1。審稿人2給的意見(jiàn)很宏觀,個(gè)人感覺(jué)可能是你行文的問(wèn)題,沒(méi)有在introduction里把自己的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)突出出來(lái),還有就是引用的文獻(xiàn)不夠,2的意見(jiàn)相對(duì)好改。全文改好后,建議最后完善下abstract,一陣見(jiàn)血地點(diǎn)出innovation,讓人能一下子抓到你的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。只要你努力去改了,審稿人和編輯會(huì)看到你的誠(chéng)意的,加油祝福! |

金蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程調(diào)劑 +9 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-30 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 抱歉 +4 | 田洪有 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料357 +3 | 麥恩莉. 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,一志愿湖南大學(xué),初試成績(jī)338 +7 | YYYYYNNNNN 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工(085600)296求調(diào)劑 +25 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-26 | 25/1250 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機(jī)化學(xué) +7 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +7 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +8 | 楒桉 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京理工大學(xué)本科211材料工程294求調(diào)劑 +8 | mikasa的圍巾 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 356求調(diào)劑 +4 | gysy?s?a 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿太原理工安全工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 0857求調(diào)劑. 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學(xué)與工程,一志愿華理能動(dòng)285求調(diào)劑 +7 | AZMK 2026-03-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4 | 丟掉懶惰 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 352分 化工與材料 +5 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拉誰(shuí)不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)調(diào)劑一志愿上海交通大學(xué)336分-本科上海211 +4 | 小魚愛(ài)有機(jī) 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 打過(guò)很多競(jìng)賽,085406控制工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|