 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1975 | 回復: 11 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題，作者小強博士將贈送您 50 個金幣 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
小強博士新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
關(guān)于投稿 已有2人參與
|
||
|
頭一天投稿，第二天主編就提了7條意見讓大修，主編本人也做過相關(guān)領(lǐng)領(lǐng)域的研究，還讓對比參考他的一篇文章！下面是給的意見，求助各位有經(jīng)驗的蟲子，這篇文章還有戲嗎？ I looked into your paper and decided to ask you for several amendments before sending it to full review. 1.You describe the first step of QFD as constructing the house of quality where in fact, the HOQ is one of the 7 QFD tools but not the first. Presenting QFD as a process of using 4 matrices is also a limitation of the original approach. Check this https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html or https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html as readily available descriptions but find an academic source that describe QFD properly and not as in many of the derived papers that carry the error endlessly. 2.Are you familiar with Reich, Y., & Levy, E. (2004). Managing product design quality under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 42(13), 2555-2572? It proposes a different way to prioritize EC to maximize the quality of the product. Does it have any relation to your approach? Can your approach lead to maximizing the quality of the product? How? 3.Franceschini (2015) should be Franceschini et al. (2015) 4.Your analysis of the consistency with only l, j, and k ignores significant information about them that comes from their relative position with other CRs. It might be only chance that you got the results as you did in this case study. Is there another way to test it? Is there a "correct" ordering? 5.Using this example to state that your approach "has an obvious advantage" is not supported. Can you provide better empirical evidence? For example, can you create 3-5 other cases and present how you generated them and test again? 6.Computational complexity is usually determined based on the dependence of the number of computational steps with respect to n – number of characteristic parameters; here it could be number of CR or number of respondents or both. Merely stating the number of steps on one problem is irrelevant. Can you offer another way to support this claim? This could also be resolved analytically by showing the details of the algorithm and going through it carefully. It could also be addressed empirically. 7.Since executing the algorithm takes fraction of a second, what is the relevance of efficiency? How many CRs are you expecting to have in a large problem? What is the largest that you encountered ever? It is better to provide data and merely state some concussions that have no practical value. 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
0703化學/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可
已經(jīng)有11人回復
-
南京大學化學調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復
-
292求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
材料專碩調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復
-
085601材料工程找調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有17人回復
-
面上5B能上會嗎？
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
化學308分調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復
-
化學工程085602 305分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有25人回復
-
求化學調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復
-
085602 化學工程專碩 340分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
納米材料753
木蟲之王 (文學泰斗)
光岳之巔
- 應助: 809 (博后)
- 金幣: 118854
- 散金: 110
- 紅花: 100
- 沙發(fā): 7
- 帖子: 95995
- 在線: 5183.5小時
- 蟲號: 526529
- 注冊: 2008-03-16
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 光學
小強博士
6樓2017-04-29 15:36:49
eiri
新蟲 (知名作家)
- 應助: 84 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7616.3
- 散金: 3915
- 紅花: 85
- 帖子: 8708
- 在線: 436.1小時
- 蟲號: 4209911
- 注冊: 2015-11-10
- 專業(yè): 微觀經(jīng)濟學
2樓2017-04-29 10:36:03
小強博士
新蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應助: 2 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 7048.6
- 散金: 1186
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 2254
- 在線: 133.7小時
- 蟲號: 5348800
- 注冊: 2016-12-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 決策理論與方法
3樓2017-04-29 11:03:40
paperhunter
榮譽版主 (文學泰斗)
還沒想好
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 應助: 14603 (教授)
- 貴賓: 11.659
- 金幣: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 紅花: 1423
- 沙發(fā): 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在線: 8880.4小時
- 蟲號: 971012
- 注冊: 2010-03-14
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
- 管轄: 論文投稿
4樓2017-04-29 11:20:38
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703本科鄭州大學求調(diào)劑 +6 | nhj_ 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理 材料求調(diào)劑 +12 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +10 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工328分調(diào)劑 +9 | 。，。，。，。i 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 大饞小子 2026-03-28 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | QiMing7 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +7 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求92調(diào)劑 +8 | 蕉蕉123 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +7 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華北電力大學能動專碩，293，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 15537177284 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-314 +3 | LILIQQ 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 零八# 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +10 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我真的很想學習 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 298調(diào)劑 +3 | jiyingjie123 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4 | lim0922 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 324 +4 | Promise-jyl 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化工專碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | question挽風 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|