| 查看: 1973 | 回復: 11 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者小強博士將贈送您 50 個金幣 | |||
小強博士新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
關于投稿 已有2人參與
|
||
|
頭一天投稿,第二天主編就提了7條意見讓大修,主編本人也做過相關領領域的研究,還讓對比參考他的一篇文章!下面是給的意見,求助各位有經(jīng)驗的蟲子,這篇文章還有戲嗎? I looked into your paper and decided to ask you for several amendments before sending it to full review. 1.You describe the first step of QFD as constructing the house of quality where in fact, the HOQ is one of the 7 QFD tools but not the first. Presenting QFD as a process of using 4 matrices is also a limitation of the original approach. Check this https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html or https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html as readily available descriptions but find an academic source that describe QFD properly and not as in many of the derived papers that carry the error endlessly. 2.Are you familiar with Reich, Y., & Levy, E. (2004). Managing product design quality under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 42(13), 2555-2572? It proposes a different way to prioritize EC to maximize the quality of the product. Does it have any relation to your approach? Can your approach lead to maximizing the quality of the product? How? 3.Franceschini (2015) should be Franceschini et al. (2015) 4.Your analysis of the consistency with only l, j, and k ignores significant information about them that comes from their relative position with other CRs. It might be only chance that you got the results as you did in this case study. Is there another way to test it? Is there a "correct" ordering? 5.Using this example to state that your approach "has an obvious advantage" is not supported. Can you provide better empirical evidence? For example, can you create 3-5 other cases and present how you generated them and test again? 6.Computational complexity is usually determined based on the dependence of the number of computational steps with respect to n – number of characteristic parameters; here it could be number of CR or number of respondents or both. Merely stating the number of steps on one problem is irrelevant. Can you offer another way to support this claim? This could also be resolved analytically by showing the details of the algorithm and going through it carefully. It could also be addressed empirically. 7.Since executing the algorithm takes fraction of a second, what is the relevance of efficiency? How many CRs are you expecting to have in a large problem? What is the largest that you encountered ever? It is better to provide data and merely state some concussions that have no practical value. 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
榮譽版主 (文學泰斗)
還沒想好
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +14 |

木蟲之王 (文學泰斗)
光岳之巔

禁蟲 (正式寫手)
|
本帖內容被屏蔽 |
新蟲 (知名作家)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 337求調劑 +4 | 《樹》 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 調劑310 +12 | 溫柔的晚安 2026-03-25 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 化學工程085602 305分求調劑 +22 | RichLi_ 2026-03-25 | 22/1100 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華理,數(shù)一英一285求A區(qū)調劑 +8 | AZMK 2026-03-25 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學與工程,一志愿華理能動285求調劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 312,生物學求調劑 +3 | 小譯同學abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調劑 一志愿070303有機化學 +3 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學324求調劑 +7 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調劑一志愿哈工大324 +7 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調劑 +14 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-25 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學/290求調劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可 +9 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調劑 +3 | question挽風 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調劑 +4 | 求求了收下我吧?/a> 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 325求調劑 +5 | 李嘉圖·S·路 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 351求調劑 +4 | 麥克阿磊 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研-291分-廈門大學(085601)-柔性電子學院材料工程專業(yè)求調劑 +3 | min3 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0854AI CV方向招收調劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調劑 +3 | desto 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|