| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3086 | 回復(fù): 8 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
yuanye2010金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
一審大修后二審4個(gè)月又給大修希望還大嗎?謝謝 已有1人參與
|
|
|
第一次投SCI:大修提交4個(gè)月后終于等來審稿意見,可是還是大修請問師兄師姐下面的審稿意見如何。啃薷膶τ趯徃迦1和2,主要是審稿人2如何說服啊?謝謝 Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to:3篇參考文獻(xiàn) 審稿人2感覺是主要應(yīng)對的對象!。徃迦3的這個(gè)I have no further comments.怎么回復(fù)較妥? 2的意見有點(diǎn)多?怎么處理較妥,謝謝師兄師姐 |
金蟲 (小有名氣)
銅蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小卡不卡. 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 317分 一志愿南理工材料工程 本科湖工大 求調(diào)劑 +10 | 芋泥小鈴鐺 2026-03-28 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研]
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +10 | 鈕恩雪 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +6 | 李木子啊哈哈 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +3 | 種圣賜 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩333求調(diào)劑 +11 | 北道巷 2026-03-24 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化085600材料專碩275|有文章專利|求調(diào)劑 +7 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +6 | 十閑wx 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 蘆lty 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 好好讀書。 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +11 | 陽陽哇塞 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)280分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 722865 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 305求調(diào)劑 +5 | 哇盧卡庫 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
|
鐘llll 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 打過很多競賽,085406控制工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290分調(diào)劑求助 +3 | 吉祥止止陳 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|