| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3084 | 回復(fù): 8 | ||
yuanye2010金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
一審大修后二審4個月又給大修希望還大嗎?謝謝 已有1人參與
|
|
第一次投SCI:大修提交4個月后終于等來審稿意見,可是還是大修請問師兄師姐下面的審稿意見如何。啃薷膶τ趯徃迦1和2,主要是審稿人2如何說服啊?謝謝 Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to:3篇參考文獻 審稿人2感覺是主要應(yīng)對的對象。!審稿人3的這個I have no further comments.怎么回復(fù)較妥? 2的意見有點多?怎么處理較妥,謝謝師兄師姐 |
銅蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (知名作家)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
對 |
金蟲 (小有名氣)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +6 | whh869393 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +7 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程085602 305分求調(diào)劑 +22 | RichLi_ 2026-03-25 | 22/1100 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求導(dǎo)師收 +9 | 天天好運來上岸?/a> 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 071000生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑,初試成績343 +7 | 小小甜面團 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可 +9 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 305求調(diào)劑 +5 | 哇盧卡庫 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉柯@ 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實習(xí)經(jīng)歷 +10 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 325求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李嘉圖·S·路 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 柚柚yoyo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)調(diào)劑一志愿上海交通大學(xué)336分-本科上海211 +4 | 小魚愛有機 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +3 | yanzhixue111 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|