 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1971 | 回復(fù): 11 | ||||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題，作者小強(qiáng)博士將贈(zèng)送您 50 個(gè)金幣 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
小強(qiáng)博士新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
關(guān)于投稿 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
頭一天投稿，第二天主編就提了7條意見讓大修，主編本人也做過相關(guān)領(lǐng)領(lǐng)域的研究，還讓對比參考他的一篇文章！下面是給的意見，求助各位有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的蟲子，這篇文章還有戲嗎？ I looked into your paper and decided to ask you for several amendments before sending it to full review. 1.You describe the first step of QFD as constructing the house of quality where in fact, the HOQ is one of the 7 QFD tools but not the first. Presenting QFD as a process of using 4 matrices is also a limitation of the original approach. Check this https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html or https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html as readily available descriptions but find an academic source that describe QFD properly and not as in many of the derived papers that carry the error endlessly. 2.Are you familiar with Reich, Y., & Levy, E. (2004). Managing product design quality under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 42(13), 2555-2572? It proposes a different way to prioritize EC to maximize the quality of the product. Does it have any relation to your approach? Can your approach lead to maximizing the quality of the product? How? 3.Franceschini (2015) should be Franceschini et al. (2015) 4.Your analysis of the consistency with only l, j, and k ignores significant information about them that comes from their relative position with other CRs. It might be only chance that you got the results as you did in this case study. Is there another way to test it? Is there a "correct" ordering? 5.Using this example to state that your approach "has an obvious advantage" is not supported. Can you provide better empirical evidence? For example, can you create 3-5 other cases and present how you generated them and test again? 6.Computational complexity is usually determined based on the dependence of the number of computational steps with respect to n – number of characteristic parameters; here it could be number of CR or number of respondents or both. Merely stating the number of steps on one problem is irrelevant. Can you offer another way to support this claim? This could also be resolved analytically by showing the details of the algorithm and going through it carefully. It could also be addressed empirically. 7.Since executing the algorithm takes fraction of a second, what is the relevance of efficiency? How many CRs are you expecting to have in a large problem? What is the largest that you encountered ever? It is better to provide data and merely state some concussions that have no practical value. 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
085601材料工程找調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京工業(yè)大學(xué)，324分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
281求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
26申博自薦
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
caolinzk789
禁蟲 (正式寫手)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
小強(qiáng)博士7樓2017-04-29 16:16:39
eiri
新蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 84 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7616.3
- 散金: 3915
- 紅花: 85
- 帖子: 8708
- 在線: 436.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 4209911
- 注冊: 2015-11-10
- 專業(yè): 微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)
2樓2017-04-29 10:36:03
小強(qiáng)博士
新蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 2 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 7048.6
- 散金: 1186
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 2254
- 在線: 133.7小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 5348800
- 注冊: 2016-12-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 決策理論與方法
3樓2017-04-29 11:03:40
paperhunter
榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒想好
-
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 - SEPI: 1
- 應(yīng)助: 14603 (教授)
- 貴賓: 11.659
- 金幣: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 紅花: 1423
- 沙發(fā): 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在線: 8880.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 971012
- 注冊: 2010-03-14
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
- 管轄: 論文投稿
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
| 主編有最終決斷權(quán)，作為同領(lǐng)域的專家沒有質(zhì)疑樓主所做研究的價(jià)值，給出了一些建設(shè)性的意見，說明對樓主的文章是認(rèn)可的。樓主要參考意見仔細(xì)修改，如果修改到位，送審后審稿意見不趨于負(fù)面，最后被接收的可能性很大。 |
» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
4樓2017-04-29 11:20:38
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分 +10 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +8 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 青春裁為三截 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿：西北大學(xué)，英一數(shù)一408-284分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 12.27 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +4 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿武漢理工大學(xué)材料工程（085601） +7 | WW.' 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 330分求調(diào)劑 +5 | qzenlc 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +9 | 大饞小子 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 不知道叫什么！ 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-314 +3 | LILIQQ 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +14 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-25 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大071010，316分求調(diào)劑 +3 | xgbiknn 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +7 | prayer13 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 打過很多競賽，085406控制工程300分，求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +4 | L when 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 上海電力大學(xué)材料防護(hù)與新材料重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室招收調(diào)劑研究生（材料、化學(xué)、電化學(xué)，環(huán)境） +4 | 我愛學(xué)電池 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調(diào)劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|