| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3085 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
yuanye2010金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
一審大修后二審4個月又給大修希望還大嗎?謝謝 已有1人參與
|
||
|
第一次投SCI:大修提交4個月后終于等來審稿意見,可是還是大修請問師兄師姐下面的審稿意見如何啊?修改對于審稿人1和2,主要是審稿人2如何說服。恐x謝 Associate Editor There are different opinions about this paper. The contributions of the paper remain unclear. The comparison with [29] should be justified. Simulation results need better organization and elaborations. A chance is provided to the authors to justify the work and additional reviewers may be assigned. Reviewer 1 The contributions of the paper are not clearly presented. The significance of the proposed work as compared to [29] should be justified. Reviewer 2 This paper proposes a distributed algorithm for the economic dispatch problem (EDP). It mainly studies the stochastic gradient-push method with asynchronous step-size and noisy gradient to deal with the finite delays in time-varying directed communication network of EDP. The author shows nice mathematical skills in presenting the results. However, the reviewer has to raise some questions about the model and algorithm in this study: 1. Why not to include ramp-up and ramp-down limit constraint for units in the EDP model? Is the proposed algorithm applicable for an EDP model with time coupling constraints? 2. The author should indicate the difference or improvement of the proposed algorithm in this study compared with reference [29]. 3. In introduction, the author mentioned ‘This work adopts asynchronous step-size, which provides a more flexible range for step-size.’ However, the advantage of asynchronous step-size is well displayed in Section 5. 4. Numerical results in Section 5 should be simplified or reorganized. The author can just take one test system to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in detail (for instance, 4-bus system). Moreover, comparison results between different cases are recommended to present in a table format for a better display. Reviewer 3 I have no further comments. Reviewer 4 The revised paper can be accepted by minor revisions. 1. Please give the name, unit of the vertical coordinates for figures. 2. The literature review is not sufficient. Please refer to:3篇參考文獻(xiàn) 審稿人2感覺是主要應(yīng)對的對象。。徃迦3的這個I have no further comments.怎么回復(fù)較妥? 2的意見有點(diǎn)多?怎么處理較妥,謝謝師兄師姐 |
|
對 |
銅蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學(xué)有機(jī)化學(xué)專業(yè),初試351分,復(fù)試被刷求調(diào)劑! +5 | 真名有冰 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +4 | wei-5 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 蘆lty 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | lin0039 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +14 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-25 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 085404求調(diào)劑,總分309,本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富 +4 | 來財aa 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 張芳銘-中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-環(huán)境工程專碩-298 +4 | 手機(jī)用戶 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +11 | 陽陽哇塞 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +17 | 顧九笙要謙虛 2026-03-24 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實習(xí)經(jīng)歷 +10 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +4 | 贈我一本書 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 086003食品工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 淼淼111 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯條 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境,總分308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|