| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2460 | 回復(fù): 15 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
linsoklove金蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
各位幫我分析理解一下審稿意見,讓我知道該怎么回答 已有4人參與
|
||
|
今天終于收到了審稿意見,但是由于英文不太好,也由于太過于緊張了吧,現(xiàn)在一臉茫然。還希望各位幫我分析一下該如何回答。審稿意見如下: Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 - Strengths: The problem shown in the manuscript is interesting and well defined. The solving method may be interesting for other researchers. The application of results may lead to increase heat transfer capabilities which is within the scope of the Journal. The CFD simulation is compared with some experimental results. Most of the model parameters are explained. Weaknesses: The main interest for readers would be the simulation method which is described, but some more details could be given such as mesh details (the picture is informative, but number of cells, cell and shape in all regions could be given explicitly). The comparison with the experiment is shown only for offset angle, is it possible to address also at least qualitatively the thickness of the layer? Maybe for one case only but some remarks could be important for other researchers. The minimal flow for sur wetting could be simulated using this method? There is a small mistyped number in Fig 3b experiment shall be 200 instead of 100. -Reviewer 2 - Dear Author, This is well-written article that does identify an important gap in xxxx. There has been a few researches on xxxx reported in open literature. However, the article would be significantly improved with the addition of more review of the xxxx. This is because the review of the literature is not thorough for study of xxxx; because the author only referred to two articles which were published in 2014 and 2007, which has a big gap almost 10 years. The author did not critically review xxxx in the Introduction. This helps to show that this parameter is important to characterize xxxx. The details of my comments and suggestions are attached with this reviewer comments. |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
| 看意見,只要是能把審稿人1給說服了,問題就不大,多和導(dǎo)師商量一下怎么從專業(yè)的角度回應(yīng)審稿人1。審稿人2給的意見很宏觀,個人感覺可能是你行文的問題,沒有在introduction里把自己的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)突出出來,還有就是引用的文獻(xiàn)不夠,2的意見相對好改。全文改好后,建議最后完善下abstract,一陣見血地點(diǎn)出innovation,讓人能一下子抓到你的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。只要你努力去改了,審稿人和編輯會看到你的誠意的,加油祝福! |

金蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (著名寫手)
榮譽(yù)版主 (文壇精英)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程 317求調(diào)劑 +8 | JKSOIID 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600 一志愿9 總分351 求調(diào)劑學(xué)校 +7 | czhcz 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +8 | 嗯嗯嗯嗯2 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +11 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭看過來。! +3 | wwwwffffff 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 江蘇蘇北高校誠邀調(diào)劑同學(xué) +3 | zzll406 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大總分298分,前三科223分 +11 | dongfang59 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 好好讀書。 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程調(diào)劑 +13 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-30 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
材料調(diào)劑
5+5
|
想要一壺桃花水 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +7 | DLkz1314. 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | AZMK 2026-03-29 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +4 | 加油a李zs 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +5 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 化學(xué)工程專碩 340分求調(diào)劑 +4 | qianbai11 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +6 | 愛羈絆 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +7 | 江辭666 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 藥學(xué)105500求調(diào)劑 +3 | Ssun。。 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324 +7 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|