| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3532 | 回復: 13 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者shangu111將贈送您 500 個金幣 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
TKDE 兩個major revision 一個reject,最后意見為reject,想申述,請大神看看可能性 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
去年投了IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,一審花了一年,review 1 給的reject, 我覺得絕大部分意見都是錯的,有些我專門用了一章節(jié)介紹,有些我根本沒做過那些假設, 有些是很正常的常識,所以很氣憤,感覺完全不尊重別人的成果。我接下來貼出review 1 的意見和我的簡單的rebuttal, 想要大家?guī)臀铱纯瓷晔龅目赡苄浴_有想問問有沒有人向TKDE申述過。 The issues of this paper are discussed as below: 1. This paper claims that the trading behavior is a function of data cost. But they just take 1(accept), 0(otherwise) into consideration, which do not show any practical correlation with data cost. This contribution is weak and limited. Rebuttal: trading behavior 指的是賣(0)或者不賣(1), 沒有其他可能,trading behavior 都可以formulate成data cost 的一個function了,他們之間還沒有correlation么? 2.Compared with the previous works, the authors not only protect the data’ but also protect the trading behaviors’ privacy under LDP framework. However, since the trading behaviors only have two kinds of results 1(accept), 0(otherwise), the real trading behaviors can be obtained by the collectors after trades. Rebuttal: 從來沒有reveal real trading behaviours, 一直reveal的,sellers執(zhí)行的都是perturbed trading decision。 3.The assumption 1 does not always hold since the data may be in a high dimensional space. And PCA cannot ensure any loss in information when projecting the high dimensional data into a lower dimensional space. Rebuttal:PCA 不就是這個用處么?保持90%或以上的variance (這就是保障沒有l(wèi)oss in information) 同時減少 data dimension 4.In order to obtain the unbiased gradient for the data collector, the authors show us that the data owners should provide two auxiliary parameters, which is calculated by the biased gradient, with the collector. Firstly, what is physical meaning of these two parameters? Why the data owners provides these two kinds of information to help collector guess their real data cost? Rebuttal:因為你要data owners 要賣他的data啊,要提供auxiliary parameters是你賣data的前提要求啊,何況提供了auxiliary parameters你的data 也被LDP保護 5.Subsection 4.1 states that the data owners perturb the data by using the perturbed gradient. But why is directly perturbing the raw data inapplicable? The authors should attempt to use their designed algorithm to learn real data cost from the perturbed data instead of redesigning a data perturbation method fitting the pricing rule to help learn the real data cost. Rebuttal: 為什么不直接用已經在文章里面單獨列了個section說了,一般的learning algorithm over perturbed data都會對這個perturbed data做一些假設,比如符合什么分布,怎么perturbed的,我這篇文章就假設perturbed data是從我這個perturbed scheme 生產出來的不行么? 6.In Algorithm 2, there is an assumption that the price follows uniform distribution U[0,2]. There is no reference and explanation to support this assumption. Rebuttal:根本沒這個假設。! In Eq(1), the pricing rule is published with the help of two parameters ϵ,δ. Is it reasonable for the data collector to get the value of ϵ,δ ? Rebuttal:ϵ,δ是data collector設置的,為啥他不知道? In experiments, Fig.6 is so confusing. There is only one computation time for one trading in practice. Why the authors the CDF of computation time for one trading? Rebuttal:因為整個learning algorithm的gradients 都是randomized,而且計算gradients還用了external library,我做1000 trails,然后畫cdf不是很正常么? |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
最怕遇到的審稿人就是對于該topic的核心問題他比你還懂。這種亂提問題的顯然是不懂;c時間解釋清楚就行了。遇到懂得人從根本否定創(chuàng)新的價值,那才難受。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
你首先要平靜情緒,作者要做的不是跟他吵架,而是解釋清楚。審稿人不可能看的太仔細,作者需要反思自己的寫作,可能并沒有能讓讀者輕松get到貢獻。你目前這個反駁,我估計編輯都不一定能滿意。首先要花一兩句表明文章的貢獻,之后再解釋細節(jié)。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 初試 317 +6 | 半拉月丙 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料學碩333求調劑 +3 | 北道巷 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調劑 +11 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學085700資源與環(huán)境總分308求調劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學一志愿985,分數349求調劑 +3 | zxts12 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調劑[0856] +4 | WayneLim327 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學求調劑 +4 | 臨澤境llllll 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 華東師范大學-071000生物學-293分-求調劑 +3 | 研究生何瑤明 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學085700資源與環(huán)境專碩,總分308求調劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學 ,070300化學學碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調劑。 +4 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學大學 ,080500材料科學與工程學碩,總分289分 +4 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 藥學383 求調劑 +3 | 藥學chy 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南化學(0703)總分337求調劑 +8 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調劑 +3 |  ̄^ ̄゜汗 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 招收調劑碩士 +4 | lidianxing 2026-03-19 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 081700化工學碩調劑 +3 | 【1】 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學336分求調劑 +6 | zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調劑南林,給自己招師弟中~ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調劑 +4 | 太陽花天天開心 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|