| 查看: 3530 | 回復(fù): 13 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者shangu111將贈送您 500 個金幣 | |||
[求助]
TKDE 兩個major revision 一個reject,最后意見為reject,想申述,請大神看看可能性 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
去年投了IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,一審花了一年,review 1 給的reject, 我覺得絕大部分意見都是錯的,有些我專門用了一章節(jié)介紹,有些我根本沒做過那些假設(shè), 有些是很正常的常識,所以很氣憤,感覺完全不尊重別人的成果。我接下來貼出review 1 的意見和我的簡單的rebuttal, 想要大家?guī)臀铱纯瓷晔龅目赡苄。還有想問問有沒有人向TKDE申述過。 The issues of this paper are discussed as below: 1. This paper claims that the trading behavior is a function of data cost. But they just take 1(accept), 0(otherwise) into consideration, which do not show any practical correlation with data cost. This contribution is weak and limited. Rebuttal: trading behavior 指的是賣(0)或者不賣(1), 沒有其他可能,trading behavior 都可以formulate成data cost 的一個function了,他們之間還沒有correlation么? 2.Compared with the previous works, the authors not only protect the data’ but also protect the trading behaviors’ privacy under LDP framework. However, since the trading behaviors only have two kinds of results 1(accept), 0(otherwise), the real trading behaviors can be obtained by the collectors after trades. Rebuttal: 從來沒有reveal real trading behaviours, 一直reveal的,sellers執(zhí)行的都是perturbed trading decision。 3.The assumption 1 does not always hold since the data may be in a high dimensional space. And PCA cannot ensure any loss in information when projecting the high dimensional data into a lower dimensional space. Rebuttal:PCA 不就是這個用處么?保持90%或以上的variance (這就是保障沒有l(wèi)oss in information) 同時減少 data dimension 4.In order to obtain the unbiased gradient for the data collector, the authors show us that the data owners should provide two auxiliary parameters, which is calculated by the biased gradient, with the collector. Firstly, what is physical meaning of these two parameters? Why the data owners provides these two kinds of information to help collector guess their real data cost? Rebuttal:因為你要data owners 要賣他的data啊,要提供auxiliary parameters是你賣data的前提要求啊,何況提供了auxiliary parameters你的data 也被LDP保護(hù) 5.Subsection 4.1 states that the data owners perturb the data by using the perturbed gradient. But why is directly perturbing the raw data inapplicable? The authors should attempt to use their designed algorithm to learn real data cost from the perturbed data instead of redesigning a data perturbation method fitting the pricing rule to help learn the real data cost. Rebuttal: 為什么不直接用已經(jīng)在文章里面單獨列了個section說了,一般的learning algorithm over perturbed data都會對這個perturbed data做一些假設(shè),比如符合什么分布,怎么perturbed的,我這篇文章就假設(shè)perturbed data是從我這個perturbed scheme 生產(chǎn)出來的不行么? 6.In Algorithm 2, there is an assumption that the price follows uniform distribution U[0,2]. There is no reference and explanation to support this assumption. Rebuttal:根本沒這個假設(shè)。。 In Eq(1), the pricing rule is published with the help of two parameters ϵ,δ. Is it reasonable for the data collector to get the value of ϵ,δ ? Rebuttal:ϵ,δ是data collector設(shè)置的,為啥他不知道? In experiments, Fig.6 is so confusing. There is only one computation time for one trading in practice. Why the authors the CDF of computation time for one trading? Rebuttal:因為整個learning algorithm的gradients 都是randomized,而且計算gradients還用了external library,我做1000 trails,然后畫cdf不是很正常么? |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
你首先要平靜情緒,作者要做的不是跟他吵架,而是解釋清楚。審稿人不可能看的太仔細(xì),作者需要反思自己的寫作,可能并沒有能讓讀者輕松get到貢獻(xiàn)。你目前這個反駁,我估計編輯都不一定能滿意。首先要花一兩句表明文章的貢獻(xiàn),之后再解釋細(xì)節(jié)。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
最怕遇到的審稿人就是對于該topic的核心問題他比你還懂。這種亂提問題的顯然是不懂;c時間解釋清楚就行了。遇到懂得人從根本否定創(chuàng)新的價值,那才難受。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
這種沒看懂就亂說的審稿人確實討厭,咱們能做的就是盡量把文章包裝的高大上。作者往往注重細(xì)節(jié),審稿人和編輯更重注關(guān)鍵點。關(guān)鍵位置把創(chuàng)新性表達(dá)到位的話他就不會這么針對細(xì)節(jié)。我看過的這類被審稿人誤解的文章,都是寫作存在一定問題,其實很好調(diào)整。我看過我同門的文章,寫的很有道理的樣子,其實就是瞎扯,但是審稿人看不出來而已。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856材料專碩353求調(diào)劑 +3 | NIFFFfff 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料工程(專)一志愿985 初試335求調(diào)劑 +3 | hiloiy 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +6 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +5 | Tyoumou 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | lucky呀呀呀鴨 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料求調(diào)劑,總分315(英一) +5 | sbdksD 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ^O^乜 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +3 |  ̄^ ̄゜汗 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料求調(diào)劑,一志愿武漢理工085601專碩 +5 | Charlieyq 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | eation27 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 招收調(diào)劑碩士 +4 | lidianxing 2026-03-19 | 12/600 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
申請回稿延期一個月,編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時間沒變,給編輯又寫郵件了,沒回復(fù)
10+3
|
wangf9518 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 081700化工學(xué)碩調(diào)劑 +3 | 【1】 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 申博26年 +3 | 八6八68 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩326求調(diào)劑 +6 | 墨煜姒莘 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] [導(dǎo)師推薦]西南科技大學(xué)國防/材料導(dǎo)師推薦 +3 | 尖角小荷 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5 | 素年祭語 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程315分求調(diào)劑 +3 | yang_0104 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|