| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3567 | 回復: 13 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者shangu111將贈送您 500 個金幣 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
TKDE 兩個major revision 一個reject,最后意見為reject,想申述,請大神看看可能性 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
去年投了IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,一審花了一年,review 1 給的reject, 我覺得絕大部分意見都是錯的,有些我專門用了一章節(jié)介紹,有些我根本沒做過那些假設(shè), 有些是很正常的常識,所以很氣憤,感覺完全不尊重別人的成果。我接下來貼出review 1 的意見和我的簡單的rebuttal, 想要大家?guī)臀铱纯瓷晔龅目赡苄。還有想問問有沒有人向TKDE申述過。 The issues of this paper are discussed as below: 1. This paper claims that the trading behavior is a function of data cost. But they just take 1(accept), 0(otherwise) into consideration, which do not show any practical correlation with data cost. This contribution is weak and limited. Rebuttal: trading behavior 指的是賣(0)或者不賣(1), 沒有其他可能,trading behavior 都可以formulate成data cost 的一個function了,他們之間還沒有correlation么? 2.Compared with the previous works, the authors not only protect the data’ but also protect the trading behaviors’ privacy under LDP framework. However, since the trading behaviors only have two kinds of results 1(accept), 0(otherwise), the real trading behaviors can be obtained by the collectors after trades. Rebuttal: 從來沒有reveal real trading behaviours, 一直reveal的,sellers執(zhí)行的都是perturbed trading decision。 3.The assumption 1 does not always hold since the data may be in a high dimensional space. And PCA cannot ensure any loss in information when projecting the high dimensional data into a lower dimensional space. Rebuttal:PCA 不就是這個用處么?保持90%或以上的variance (這就是保障沒有l(wèi)oss in information) 同時減少 data dimension 4.In order to obtain the unbiased gradient for the data collector, the authors show us that the data owners should provide two auxiliary parameters, which is calculated by the biased gradient, with the collector. Firstly, what is physical meaning of these two parameters? Why the data owners provides these two kinds of information to help collector guess their real data cost? Rebuttal:因為你要data owners 要賣他的data啊,要提供auxiliary parameters是你賣data的前提要求啊,何況提供了auxiliary parameters你的data 也被LDP保護 5.Subsection 4.1 states that the data owners perturb the data by using the perturbed gradient. But why is directly perturbing the raw data inapplicable? The authors should attempt to use their designed algorithm to learn real data cost from the perturbed data instead of redesigning a data perturbation method fitting the pricing rule to help learn the real data cost. Rebuttal: 為什么不直接用已經(jīng)在文章里面單獨列了個section說了,一般的learning algorithm over perturbed data都會對這個perturbed data做一些假設(shè),比如符合什么分布,怎么perturbed的,我這篇文章就假設(shè)perturbed data是從我這個perturbed scheme 生產(chǎn)出來的不行么? 6.In Algorithm 2, there is an assumption that the price follows uniform distribution U[0,2]. There is no reference and explanation to support this assumption. Rebuttal:根本沒這個假設(shè)。。 In Eq(1), the pricing rule is published with the help of two parameters ϵ,δ. Is it reasonable for the data collector to get the value of ϵ,δ ? Rebuttal:ϵ,δ是data collector設(shè)置的,為啥他不知道? In experiments, Fig.6 is so confusing. There is only one computation time for one trading in practice. Why the authors the CDF of computation time for one trading? Rebuttal:因為整個learning algorithm的gradients 都是randomized,而且計算gradients還用了external library,我做1000 trails,然后畫cdf不是很正常么? |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
這種沒看懂就亂說的審稿人確實討厭,咱們能做的就是盡量把文章包裝的高大上。作者往往注重細節(jié),審稿人和編輯更重注關(guān)鍵點。關(guān)鍵位置把創(chuàng)新性表達到位的話他就不會這么針對細節(jié)。我看過的這類被審稿人誤解的文章,都是寫作存在一定問題,其實很好調(diào)整。我看過我同門的文章,寫的很有道理的樣子,其實就是瞎扯,但是審稿人看不出來而已。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
你首先要平靜情緒,作者要做的不是跟他吵架,而是解釋清楚。審稿人不可能看的太仔細,作者需要反思自己的寫作,可能并沒有能讓讀者輕松get到貢獻。你目前這個反駁,我估計編輯都不一定能滿意。首先要花一兩句表明文章的貢獻,之后再解釋細節(jié)。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學354求調(diào)劑 +6 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料學碩333求調(diào)劑 +11 | 北道巷 2026-03-24 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 本科雙非材料,跨考一志愿華電085801電氣,283求調(diào)劑,任何專業(yè)都可以 +6 | 芝士雪baoo 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +13 | zhn03 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學材料與化工方向336分 +9 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華北電力大學能動專碩,293,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 15537177284 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
y7czhao 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | lin0039 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學324求調(diào)劑 +7 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 086502化學工程342求調(diào)劑 +6 | 阿姨復古不過 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +10 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 北京林業(yè)大學碩導招生廣告 +6 | kongweilin 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿 南京航空航天大學大學 ,080500材料科學與工程學碩 +4 | @taotao 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 351求調(diào)劑 +4 | 麥克阿磊 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑總分293英一數(shù)二 +4 | 鋼鐵大炮 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 300分,材料,求調(diào)劑,英一數(shù)二 +5 | 超贊的 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 化工專碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | question挽風 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 急發(fā)核心期刊論文 +3 | 賢達問津 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|