| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3516 | 回復(fù): 14 | ||||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者M(jìn)ining將贈(zèng)送您 3 個(gè)金幣 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
Mining新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
審稿意見不太好,結(jié)果reject and resubmit 已有1人參與
|
|||
|
environment earth science 審稿大半年,返回意見,結(jié)果是reject andresubmit,不知希望大不,意見如下: Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work; however, are encouraging you to resubmit the manuscript with extensive revisions. The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided If you choose to revise your original research, you must make all the necessary modifications before resubmitting to Environmental Earth Sciences for further evaluation. Please revise your original manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED MANUSCRIPT WITH ALL CHANGES CLEARLY MARKED (E.G. IN RED, BUT NOT IN TRACK CHANGES VERSION) SO THAT THE REVIEWER CAN EASILY ASSESS YOUR REVISED WORK. When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the reviewer's comments. To expedite the review of your revised manuscript, please be specific and direct. Once the revised manuscript is prepared, you can upload it and submit it through your Author Center and please delete the old versions of your files. Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX). To facilitate timely publication, your revised paper should be uploaded swiftly. If it is not possible for you to submit your revised manuscript in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your revised version as a new submission. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: There is no novelty in the text. In addition, the quality of the language needs to improve significantly by a native English speaker. Reviewer #3: This paper constructed a model to compute hydraulic gradient of PTBS transported in pipeline. A good contribution is that hydraulic gradient can be calculated through 3 variables (pipe diameter, flow velocity and slurry mass fraction) which are all easy to achieve. So, it is certainly topical and of interest to researchers in related areas. However, there are some problems with this paper. 1. The difference between paste-like and paste should be described more clearly. My suggestion is adding a group of slump test to distinguish them macroscopically. 2. Figures in this paper need all to be redrawn more clearly, and the text in the figures exported from software should be translated to English. 3. It is better to mark key data in Fig.2, and describe it in the figure caption. 4. In the chapter of DATA PREPARATION, mass fraction of paste-like varies from 68% to 76%; however, the relative error of hydraulic gradientvalues measured by site experiment and calculation model is 12% when mass fraction is 70%. Is it bigger at 68%? Analyze it! 5.The 'numerical simulation' in Table 5 may mean 'calculated value'? It appears in various places in the chapter of INDUSTRIAL VALIDATION. Check carefully! To sum up, the formula derivation process in this paper is reasonable; the research methods are feasible; and the result is reliable. However, for the problems above, it certainly should be revised carefully. Editor-in-Chief's comments: In addition to addressing the concerns of the reviewers above, please take care of the following: 1. You must obtain assistance with revisions to the English presentation as there are problems. 2. References: Please be sure that all the references cited in the manuscript are also included in the reference list and vice versa with matching spellings and dates. When citing references by the same author(s) in a sequence, only use the year for the second, third, etc.; for example: Wang et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2011 should be cited as: Wang et al. 2011, 2012. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (初入文壇)

|
有點(diǎn)難 第一個(gè)審稿人直接no novelty~ 不過可能是寫作問題,好好改改試試 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒想好
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 |
| 第一個(gè)審稿人說文章沒有新意,樓主需要列出文章的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn);第三個(gè)審稿人的意見比較正面,但提的問題比較多;主編提到了語(yǔ)言需要潤(rùn)色以及參考文獻(xiàn)引用格式的問題。這些都需要修改到位。如果樓主能夠參考第三個(gè)審稿人和主編的意見作出到位的修改,回答能夠令兩個(gè)審稿人和主編都滿意,再投后文章被接收的希望很大。 |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)280分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 722865 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | 某某某某位 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海交大生物與醫(yī)藥專碩324分,求調(diào)劑 +5 | jiajunX 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿武漢理工大學(xué)材料工程(085601) +3 | WW.' 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +9 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-18 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +6 | 87639 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑院校信息 +6 | CX 330 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué)071000,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 沿岸有貝殼6 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 北道巷 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 22 350 本科985求調(diào)劑,求老登收留 +3 | 李軼男003 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 白QF 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | Ma_xt 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 阿姐阿姐家啊 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ,070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調(diào)劑。 +4 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩297已過四六級(jí)求調(diào)劑推薦 +11 | adaie 2026-03-19 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交通 專碩 材料355 本科雙非 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 西南交通專材355 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 18889395102 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|