| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3538 | 回復(fù): 14 | ||||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問(wèn)題,作者M(jìn)ining將贈(zèng)送您 3 個(gè)金幣 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
Mining新蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
審稿意見(jiàn)不太好,結(jié)果reject and resubmit 已有1人參與
|
|||
|
environment earth science 審稿大半年,返回意見(jiàn),結(jié)果是reject andresubmit,不知希望大不,意見(jiàn)如下: Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work; however, are encouraging you to resubmit the manuscript with extensive revisions. The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided If you choose to revise your original research, you must make all the necessary modifications before resubmitting to Environmental Earth Sciences for further evaluation. Please revise your original manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED MANUSCRIPT WITH ALL CHANGES CLEARLY MARKED (E.G. IN RED, BUT NOT IN TRACK CHANGES VERSION) SO THAT THE REVIEWER CAN EASILY ASSESS YOUR REVISED WORK. When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the reviewer's comments. To expedite the review of your revised manuscript, please be specific and direct. Once the revised manuscript is prepared, you can upload it and submit it through your Author Center and please delete the old versions of your files. Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX). To facilitate timely publication, your revised paper should be uploaded swiftly. If it is not possible for you to submit your revised manuscript in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your revised version as a new submission. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: There is no novelty in the text. In addition, the quality of the language needs to improve significantly by a native English speaker. Reviewer #3: This paper constructed a model to compute hydraulic gradient of PTBS transported in pipeline. A good contribution is that hydraulic gradient can be calculated through 3 variables (pipe diameter, flow velocity and slurry mass fraction) which are all easy to achieve. So, it is certainly topical and of interest to researchers in related areas. However, there are some problems with this paper. 1. The difference between paste-like and paste should be described more clearly. My suggestion is adding a group of slump test to distinguish them macroscopically. 2. Figures in this paper need all to be redrawn more clearly, and the text in the figures exported from software should be translated to English. 3. It is better to mark key data in Fig.2, and describe it in the figure caption. 4. In the chapter of DATA PREPARATION, mass fraction of paste-like varies from 68% to 76%; however, the relative error of hydraulic gradientvalues measured by site experiment and calculation model is 12% when mass fraction is 70%. Is it bigger at 68%? Analyze it! 5.The 'numerical simulation' in Table 5 may mean 'calculated value'? It appears in various places in the chapter of INDUSTRIAL VALIDATION. Check carefully! To sum up, the formula derivation process in this paper is reasonable; the research methods are feasible; and the result is reliable. However, for the problems above, it certainly should be revised carefully. Editor-in-Chief's comments: In addition to addressing the concerns of the reviewers above, please take care of the following: 1. You must obtain assistance with revisions to the English presentation as there are problems. 2. References: Please be sure that all the references cited in the manuscript are also included in the reference list and vice versa with matching spellings and dates. When citing references by the same author(s) in a sequence, only use the year for the second, third, etc.; for example: Wang et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2011 should be cited as: Wang et al. 2011, 2012. 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)IOS客戶端 |
新蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)

|
有點(diǎn)難 第一個(gè)審稿人直接no novelty~ 不過(guò)可能是寫(xiě)作問(wèn)題,好好改改試試 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)Android客戶端 |
榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒(méi)想好
![]() |
專(zhuān)家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 |
| 第一個(gè)審稿人說(shuō)文章沒(méi)有新意,樓主需要列出文章的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn);第三個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)比較正面,但提的問(wèn)題比較多;主編提到了語(yǔ)言需要潤(rùn)色以及參考文獻(xiàn)引用格式的問(wèn)題。這些都需要修改到位。如果樓主能夠參考第三個(gè)審稿人和主編的意見(jiàn)作出到位的修改,回答能夠令兩個(gè)審稿人和主編都滿意,再投后文章被接收的希望很大。 |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑 +3 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過(guò) 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 330一志愿中國(guó)海洋大學(xué) 化學(xué)工程 085602 有讀博意愿 求調(diào)劑 +3 | wywy.. 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +5 | Li李魚(yú) 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 26考研上岸版26 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 277跪求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1915668 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑 +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +17 | 顧九笙要謙虛 2026-03-24 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可 +7 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 招收生物學(xué)/細(xì)胞生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | IceGuo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +7 | 蛋黃咸肉粽 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李木子啊哈哈 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大,085400,320,求調(diào)劑 +4 | gdlf9999 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 生物技術(shù)與工程 +3 | 1294608413 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)院校調(diào)劑 +4 | 周56 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學(xué)碩288求調(diào)劑 +8 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿國(guó)科過(guò)程所081700,274求調(diào)劑 +3 | 三水研0水立方 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大,0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分,有大創(chuàng)項(xiàng)目,四級(jí)已過(guò) +6 | 幸運(yùn)哩哩 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +5 | 來(lái)好運(yùn)來(lái)來(lái)來(lái) 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|