Optics Express投稿求助
投Optics Express，兩個(gè)審稿人，意見(jiàn)如下：
Reviewer1: Overall a good paper that's unfortunately not giving any experimental results, but I still recommend publishing it as steeping stone for some cool applications perhaps. The writing quality can be improved by following some revision suggestions listed above. I recommend publishing it after revisions.
Reviewer2:Although this work presents technically sound results, the Authors should explicitly discuss what the practical applications of this theoretical study are and they should stress the advancements of their work concerning what is already present in literature.
編輯：We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.
請(qǐng)問(wèn)這種修改后重投還有希望嗎？謝謝！
返回小木蟲查看更多
京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802022153號(hào)
這要看你怎么改了，請(qǐng)注意編輯的回復(fù)，應(yīng)該已經(jīng)說(shuō)的很明了。
1.引言部分可能沒(méi)有較為全面的介紹與該研究相關(guān)的進(jìn)展，所以不能凸顯該文章對(duì)推動(dòng)這一相關(guān)領(lǐng)域研究的意義，即該文章的特色或新穎性到底是什么。
2.與1比較相似，主要還是該文章的價(jià)值定位，所謂的修改 再修改也不會(huì)突破它既有的局限性，編輯的意思涉及到你研究的局限性，這是無(wú)法通過(guò)言語(yǔ)的技巧去回避的，最多只能是以后工作的內(nèi)容。
沒(méi)用，大概率讓你發(fā)那個(gè)新的水刊
祝福
“The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.”
看了能否改的很徹底了
OSA Continuum嘛，哈哈~
，
下一個(gè)